New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 5 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPP exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 5
[All CPP Questions]

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?

#include

#include

#include

using namespace std;

int main ()

{

int t[] = {1, 2 ,3 ,4 ,5, 6 , 7, 8 , 9, 10};

vectorv1(t, t+10);

dequed1(t, t+10);

d1.empty();

v1.empty();

if (v1.isempty())

{

cout<<"I am empty ";

}

else

{

cout<<"I am not empty ";

}

cout<

return 0;

}

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Louvenia at May 05, 2022, 04:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Karma
4 months ago
No way, it should output "I am not empty 10 10" if it compiles!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
4 months ago
So, is it option C for sure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
4 months ago
Wait, I thought both containers would be non-empty?
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
4 months ago
Totally agree, that will cause a compilation error!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
5 months ago
The code has a typo, should be v1.empty() instead of v1.isempty().
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
5 months ago
I think the key here is the "shared set of values" part. That makes me think it's probably Security Culture, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if this is a fully qualified domain name or a virtual domain name. The domain name looks a bit unusual with the "ClWcertified" part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the similarities between communism and radical Islam. I think I can handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
5 months ago
Okay, I've looked at the exhibits and I think option D is the way to go. Creating a single monitor and applying it to the pool, while removing the pool member-level monitors, seems like the most efficient way to minimize the configuration. I'll make sure to double-check my work, but I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel