MENU
Transaction validation on DAG-based DLTs is designed in a way that allows legitimate transactions to be considered untrusted due to random chance.
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CBSP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
ST
Stephaine
12 months ago
Sounds a bit risky to me, not sure how I feel about that.
JO
Jovita
12 months ago
True, it's a unique feature of DAG-based systems.
BR
Breana
12 months ago
Wait, really? I thought all legit transactions were automatically trusted.
ME
Melodie
1 year ago
I disagree, I think all transactions should be trusted if validated.
SH
Sharika
1 year ago
That's true, randomness plays a big role in DAGs.
HE
Hershel
1 year ago
I recall that in DAGs, the validation process can be influenced by random factors, but I thought that was more about efficiency than trustworthiness.
SI
Silvana
1 year ago
I feel like the wording is tricky here. I thought legitimate transactions were always trusted in DLTs, but maybe there's a nuance I'm missing.
KY
Kyoko
1 year ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and it was about how randomness affects trust in transactions. I might lean towards "True."
AR
Arlette
1 year ago
I remember discussing how DAG-based DLTs can sometimes lead to uncertainty in transaction validation, but I'm not sure if that means they are considered untrusted.
PA
Paulina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know webhooks are used for notifications, but I can't remember which HTTP method is typically used.
AR
Ariel
1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is Parametric estimating, since it uses values from previous similar projects.