What are some likely repercussions that could occur as a result of a 51% attack to the Bitcoin network? (Select three.)
Suggested Answer: A, B, C
Get Premium CBSA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The 4 main attacks that can happen directly as a result of the 51% attack are: Selfish mining. Cancelling transactions. Double Spending. Random forks.
20 comments · newest first
AL
Alysa
2 months ago
I agree with B and C. Trust is everything in crypto!
JA
Jaleesa
2 months ago
C is crucial. Cancelling transactions would lead to chaos.
CU
Curtis
2 months ago
I feel like A is a strong choice. Unplanned forks can disrupt everything.
CA
Carisa
2 months ago
Definitely B! Double spending would be a nightmare for transactions.
MI
Mitsue
2 months ago
A and C seem likely too. Unplanned forks can confuse users.
ME
Melodie
3 months ago
I think B is a big risk. Double spending could ruin trust.
CA
Caprice
3 months ago
A planned fork? That's a stretch, isn't it?
CE
Celeste
3 months ago
Totally agree, double spending is a major concern!
AL
Alex
3 months ago
Wait, can they really cancel transactions? Sounds fishy.
SH
Shenika
3 months ago
I think an unplanned fork could happen too.
LA
Lauran
3 months ago
Definitely double spending is a big risk!
TH
Theodora
4 months ago
A planned fork? That's a stretch, isn't it?
CO
Colette
4 months ago
Totally agree, double spending is a major concern!
MO
Mona
4 months ago
Wait, can they really cancel transactions? Sounds fishy.
JO
Joaquin
6 months ago
I think an unplanned fork could happen too.
GL
Glory
6 months ago
Definitely double spending is a big risk!
KE
Kenda
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards double spending and maybe a planned fork, but I’m not confident about the third option. I wish we had more practice questions on this topic!
AN
Angelyn
6 months ago
Cancelling transactions seems plausible too. I feel like we discussed how attackers could manipulate the network to invalidate transactions.
ME
Merri
7 months ago
I’m not entirely sure about the unplanned fork. I remember it being mentioned, but I can’t recall if it’s a direct result of a 51% attack.
RY
Ryan
7 months ago
I think double spending is definitely one of the repercussions. It’s like what we practiced in that case study about blockchain vulnerabilities.