Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Blockchain CBSA Exam - Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

You have flown to NYC to have a discussion with a technical executive of a too big to fail bank. You are having a discussion about blockchain algos and the customer is asking what are some disadvantages of using a POW algo?
A) Centralization of blockchain control
B) Only use case for computational power is blockchain
C) Large expenditures for computational power
D) Not profitable for miners
E) 51% attack mitigation

Blockchain CBSA Exam - Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBSA exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All CBSA Questions]

You have flown to NYC to have a discussion with a technical executive of a too big to fail bank. You are having a discussion about blockchain algos and the customer is asking what are some disadvantages of using a POW algo?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Rhea at Dec 06, 2022, 07:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBSA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Emmanuel
10 months ago
Only use case for computational power? That's a stretch!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
10 months ago
Centralization is a big issue, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
10 months ago
Wait, is it really not profitable for miners anymore?
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
11 months ago
Totally agree, the expenses are insane!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
11 months ago
POW requires huge energy costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
11 months ago
I feel like the computational power aspect is a big deal, but I'm not confident if it's just about blockchain use cases, so option B seems tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that miners can face profitability issues, so option D could be relevant too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think centralization could be a concern with POW, maybe option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
11 months ago
I remember discussing how POW can lead to high energy costs, so I think option C might be a strong choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
11 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to focus on the requirements - we need to use the latest version of SQL Server and support the SQL Server Agent service, while minimizing administrative effort. Based on that, I'd say Azure SQL Managed Instance is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the distinction between the baseline and target architectures here. I'll need to re-read the TOGAF chapter to make sure I understand which diagrams and matrices are appropriate for each.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
11 months ago
I remember we discussed volume consolidation in class, and it seems like that might be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
11 months ago
I think there was a practice question that mentioned using Web3.js. But I'm unsure if it's really closed source or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
11 months ago
I'm really uncertain about the differences in enrollment criteria. Wasn't one of them for nursing home certifiable patients only?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 year ago
The 51% attack mitigation is an advantage, not a disadvantage! But I agree that the huge energy costs of POW are a major downside. Gotta love those high electricity bills.
upvoted 0 times
An
1 year ago
I agree, the high energy costs of POW can really add up. It's definitely a major disadvantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
1 year ago
D) Not profitable for miners
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
1 year ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
1 year ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
1 year ago
Yes, the 51% attack mitigation is definitely an advantage, but the high energy costs are a major downside.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
E) 51% attack mitigation
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 year ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
1 year ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
1 year ago
I'm going to go with C. Spending a ton of money on computational power doesn't sound like a very efficient or sustainable model for a blockchain network. Maybe they should look into Proof-of-Stake instead?
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
1 year ago
E) 51% attack mitigation
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 year ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
1 year ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kate
1 year ago
Haha, can you imagine how much it must cost to run a POW blockchain? The electric bill alone would be enough to bankrupt a small country!
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
1 year ago
E) 51% attack mitigation
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Essie
1 year ago
Hmm, I think B and C are both good options. The fact that the only use case for the computational power is the blockchain itself is a major disadvantage of the POW algorithm.
upvoted 0 times
Selma
1 year ago
Hmm, I think B and C are both good options. The fact that the only use case for the computational power is the blockchain itself is a major disadvantage of the POW algorithm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
1 year ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
1 year ago
B) Only use case for computational power is blockchain
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
1 year ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
1 year ago
I agree, C is definitely a major disadvantage. The amount of computational power required can be a barrier for many miners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
1 year ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
1 year ago
E) 51% attack mitigation
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
1 year ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
1 year ago
The correct answer is C. Large expenditures for computational power. Proof-of-Work (POW) algorithms require a significant amount of computational power, which can be quite costly for miners and the overall network.
upvoted 0 times
Cora
1 year ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
1 year ago
B) Only use case for computational power is blockchain
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casandra
1 year ago
E) 51% attack mitigation is an important factor to consider when discussing disadvantages of using a POW algo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
1 year ago
C) Large expenditures for computational power can be a drawback for using a POW algo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
1 year ago
A) Centralization of blockchain control is a major disadvantage of using a POW algo.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel