Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Blockchain CBDE Exam - Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Hashing Mining uses:
C) the Dagger-Hashimoto hashing while internally the EVM uses Keccack256 which is almost similar to SHA256, but has a different padding so produces different hashes.
A) Keccack256 while internally to hash values it's easy to use the Dagger-Hashimoto to create a meaningful hash.
B) the Dagger-Hashimoto hashing while internally the EVM uses SHA256 which is an alias for Keccack256.

Blockchain CBDE Exam - Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 3
[All CBDE Questions]

Hashing Mining uses:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jestine
7 months ago
B is misleading, EVM doesn't use SHA256 as an alias for Keccack256.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the EVM using Keccack256? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
7 months ago
A is totally wrong, Dagger-Hashimoto is not used like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
8 months ago
Definitely C! The padding difference is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
8 months ago
I thought Keccack256 and SHA256 were basically the same?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
8 months ago
I vaguely remember that the EVM uses Keccak256, but I’m not confident about how it relates to Dagger-Hashimoto.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
8 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like Keccak256 is important, but I might mix it up with SHA256 sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
8 months ago
I think Dagger-Hashimoto is definitely involved in mining, but I can't recall the exact hashing functions used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
8 months ago
I remember studying that Keccak256 is used in Ethereum, but I'm not sure if it's the same as SHA256.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward configuration question. I'd start by reviewing the options and thinking through the implications of each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
8 months ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. The logic seems straightforward, and I can see how the num array will be transformed. I'll double-check my work, but I think I've got the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel