New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Blockchain CBDE Exam - Topic 1 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 1
[All CBDE Questions]

Which statement is true about the EVM?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mica
3 months ago
I thought the EVM was more powerful, but I guess not?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
3 months ago
Wait, C can't be right, no direct access to graphics cards!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
B is spot on, EVM is really sandboxed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
4 months ago
Totally agree with A, Bitcoin is way more powerful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
4 months ago
A is correct, EVM isn't Turing Complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
4 months ago
I vaguely remember something about the EVM being powerful, but I don't think it has direct access to graphics cards. That seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
5 months ago
I feel like I saw a question about Turing completeness before, but I'm not convinced that the EVM is perfect for computational tasks like option C suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
5 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar; I recall that the EVM can't interact with hardware directly because of its sandboxed nature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
5 months ago
I remember studying that the EVM is sandboxed, but I'm not sure if it really means it's less powerful than Bitcoin.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The EVM being sandboxed makes me think option B might be correct, but I'm not confident that it can't access anything outside a blockchain node. And I'm not sure if the Turing completeness claim in option C is accurate either. I'll need to review the differences between the EVM and the Bitcoin network more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key here is that the EVM is Turing complete, which means it can perform any computation that a traditional computer can. So option C is correct - the EVM is extremely powerful and can handle computationally intensive tasks. The sandboxing just means it's isolated from the underlying hardware, not that it's less capable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I know the EVM is sandboxed, but I'm not sure if that means it's less powerful than the Bitcoin network. And I'm not sure about the Turing completeness claim either. I'll need to review my notes on the EVM's architecture and features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
5 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our understanding of the EVM's capabilities. I'll need to carefully consider the differences between the EVM and the Bitcoin network, as well as the EVM's level of sandboxing and Turing completeness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. We need to be able to track the returned items, so enabling the Vendor Return Authorizations feature and customizing the Inventory Activity Detail report to include the Vendor RMA status seem like the two settings we need to configure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the formula to use here. Is it the present value of an annuity formula or something else?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
10 months ago
I heard the EVM is so powerful, it can even run Crysis.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
9 months ago
C) The EVM is extremely powerful, turing complete and perfect for doing computational intensive things, because of the direct access to the graphics card.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
10 months ago
B) The EVM can't access hardware layers or anything outside a blockchain node because it's sandboxed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
10 months ago
A) While the EVM is Sandboxed, it isn't as powerful as the Bitcoin Network, because it's not Turing Complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felicidad
10 months ago
Computational intensive things? Sounds like the EVM is trying to be the new supercomputer.
upvoted 0 times
Maryann
9 months ago
Computational intensive things? Sounds like the EVM is trying to be the new supercomputer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
9 months ago
C) The EVM is extremely powerful, turing complete and perfect for doing computational intensive things, because of the direct access to the graphics card.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
9 months ago
B) The EVM can't access hardware layers or anything outside a blockchain node because it's sandboxed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
9 months ago
A) While the EVM is Sandboxed, it isn't as powerful as the Bitcoin Network, because it's not Turing Complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thad
11 months ago
Direct access to the graphics card? Is this the EVM or a gaming console?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
11 months ago
The EVM can't access hardware layers? That's weird, I thought it had more flexibility than that.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
10 months ago
B) The EVM can't access hardware layers or anything outside a blockchain node because it's sandboxed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
10 months ago
A) While the EVM is Sandboxed, it isn't as powerful as the Bitcoin Network, because it's not Turing Complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marge
11 months ago
I thought the EVM was Turing-complete, not sure about the sandbox capabilities though.
upvoted 0 times
Paulina
9 months ago
I thought the EVM was Turing-complete, not sure about the sandbox capabilities though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
10 months ago
C) The EVM is extremely powerful, turing complete and perfect for doing computational intensive things, because of the direct access to the graphics card.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
10 months ago
B) The EVM can't access hardware layers or anything outside a blockchain node because it's sandboxed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
10 months ago
A) While the EVM is Sandboxed, it isn't as powerful as the Bitcoin Network, because it's not Turing Complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
11 months ago
But doesn't the EVM have limited access to hardware?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
11 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel