Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Blockchain CBDE Exam - Topic 1 Question 92 Discussion

Posted by Jacquline on Jun 30, 2024 at 02:45 AM

Which statement is true about the EVM?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
MI
Mica 11 months ago
I thought the EVM was more powerful, but I guess not?
VA
Vallie 11 months ago
Wait, C can't be right, no direct access to graphics cards!
FE
Felix 11 months ago
B is spot on, EVM is really sandboxed.
BE
Ben 12 months ago
Totally agree with A, Bitcoin is way more powerful!
RO
Rose 12 months ago
A is correct, EVM isn't Turing Complete.
NA
Nada 12 months ago
I vaguely remember something about the EVM being powerful, but I don't think it has direct access to graphics cards. That seems off to me.
JE
Jeff 1 year ago
I feel like I saw a question about Turing completeness before, but I'm not convinced that the EVM is perfect for computational tasks like option C suggests.
MA
Makeda 1 year ago
I think option B sounds familiar; I recall that the EVM can't interact with hardware directly because of its sandboxed nature.
OC
Octavio 1 year ago
I remember studying that the EVM is sandboxed, but I'm not sure if it really means it's less powerful than Bitcoin.
DE
Denise 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The EVM being sandboxed makes me think option B might be correct, but I'm not confident that it can't access anything outside a blockchain node. And I'm not sure if the Turing completeness claim in option C is accurate either. I'll need to review the differences between the EVM and the Bitcoin network more carefully.
RA
Raylene 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key here is that the EVM is Turing complete, which means it can perform any computation that a traditional computer can. So option C is correct - the EVM is extremely powerful and can handle computationally intensive tasks. The sandboxing just means it's isolated from the underlying hardware, not that it's less capable.
ME
Mendy 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I know the EVM is sandboxed, but I'm not sure if that means it's less powerful than the Bitcoin network. And I'm not sure about the Turing completeness claim either. I'll need to review my notes on the EVM's architecture and features.
EL
Eliseo 1 year ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our understanding of the EVM's capabilities. I'll need to carefully consider the differences between the EVM and the Bitcoin network, as well as the EVM's level of sandboxing and Turing completeness.
RE
Reena 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. We need to be able to track the returned items, so enabling the Vendor Return Authorizations feature and customizing the Inventory Activity Detail report to include the Vendor RMA status seem like the two settings we need to configure.
RY
Ryann 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the formula to use here. Is it the present value of an annuity formula or something else?
AR
Arlene 1 year ago
I heard the EVM is so powerful, it can even run Crysis.
DO
Dottie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arlene
C) The EVM is extremely powerful, turing complete and perfect for doing computational intensive things, because of the direct access to the graphics card.
CA
Carman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arlene
B) The EVM can't access hardware layers or anything outside a blockchain node because it's sandboxed.
BE
Becky 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arlene
A) While the EVM is Sandboxed, it isn't as powerful as the Bitcoin Network, because it's not Turing Complete.
FE
Felicidad 2 years ago
Computational intensive things? Sounds like the EVM is trying to be the new supercomputer.
MA
Maryann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Felicidad
Computational intensive things? Sounds like the EVM is trying to be the new supercomputer.
MA
Marica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Felicidad
C) The EVM is extremely powerful, turing complete and perfect for doing computational intensive things, because of the direct access to the graphics card.
DO
Dolores 1 year ago
↳ replying to Felicidad
B) The EVM can't access hardware layers or anything outside a blockchain node because it's sandboxed.
MA
Maira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Felicidad
A) While the EVM is Sandboxed, it isn't as powerful as the Bitcoin Network, because it's not Turing Complete.
TH
Thad 2 years ago
Direct access to the graphics card? Is this the EVM or a gaming console?
CO
Cordelia 2 years ago
The EVM can't access hardware layers? That's weird, I thought it had more flexibility than that.
CH
Chantell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cordelia
B) The EVM can't access hardware layers or anything outside a blockchain node because it's sandboxed.
LI
Lili 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cordelia
A) While the EVM is Sandboxed, it isn't as powerful as the Bitcoin Network, because it's not Turing Complete.
MA
Marge 2 years ago
I thought the EVM was Turing-complete, not sure about the sandbox capabilities though.
PA
Paulina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marge
I thought the EVM was Turing-complete, not sure about the sandbox capabilities though.
SH
Shelton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marge
C) The EVM is extremely powerful, turing complete and perfect for doing computational intensive things, because of the direct access to the graphics card.
TA
Tamesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marge
B) The EVM can't access hardware layers or anything outside a blockchain node because it's sandboxed.
JO
Joni 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marge
A) While the EVM is Sandboxed, it isn't as powerful as the Bitcoin Network, because it's not Turing Complete.
WI
Willodean 2 years ago
But doesn't the EVM have limited access to hardware?
BR
Brett 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
WI
Willodean 2 years ago
I think the answer is B.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel