Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS TM12 Exam - Topic 5 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TM12 exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 5
[All TM12 Questions]

You are not confident with the assessment of the risk level and you suspect that it will be possible to find high-priority bugs in low-risk areas.

Furthermore the period for test execution is very short. Your goal is to test all the product risks in a risk-based way, while assuring that each product risk gets at least some amount of testing.

Which of the following answers describes the best test execution schedule in this scenario?

Number of correct responses: 1

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Veronika at Apr 09, 2025, 10:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mary
5 months ago
Wow, I didn't expect T10 to be tested first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
5 months ago
Not sure about that, seems risky to skip T4 and T5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
6 months ago
Totally agree, low-risk areas can hide serious bugs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
6 months ago
Really? Testing high-priority bugs in low-risk areas sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
6 months ago
I think we should prioritize T1, T2, T3 first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused, honestly. I thought we should start with the highest risk first, so maybe option C makes sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
7 months ago
This is tricky! I keep thinking about how we discussed testing low-risk areas for hidden bugs. Could option A be a good choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
7 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to balance risk and time. I feel like option D might help cover high-priority areas first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think prioritizing tests based on risk is crucial here. Maybe option B could work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
7 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think I can handle it. I'll start by prioritizing the high-risk areas, but I'll also make sure to allocate some time for the low-risk areas just in case there are any hidden issues there. I'll need to be strategic in my approach to make the most of the limited time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
7 months ago
Okay, I think I have an idea. Since the test execution time is limited, I'll need to focus on the most critical areas first, but also make sure to allocate some time for the low-risk areas. Maybe a combination of the options would work best?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the scenario. If the risk assessment is unreliable, how can I be sure that I'm testing the right areas? I'll need to come up with a strategy that balances coverage and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. Since the risk assessment is not reliable, I'll need to think carefully about how to prioritize the tests to cover the high-risk areas while also exploring the low-risk areas for potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
I believe option B is the best choice. It focuses on testing the high-risk areas first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 year ago
So, which test execution schedule do you think is the best?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
I agree with you, Gail. We need to focus on the critical areas first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
1 year ago
Ha! Choosing the tests in reverse order, like in option C? That's a bold move, but I don't think it's the best approach in this scenario. Maybe the test team is feeling a bit mischievous today.
upvoted 0 times
Tommy
12 months ago
It's important to ensure that each product risk gets some amount of testing, regardless of the schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
12 months ago
Maybe the test team thought they could catch more bugs by testing in reverse order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
1 year ago
I think we should prioritize testing the high-risk areas first, regardless of the order in the schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
I agree, choosing tests in reverse order might not be the best approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dawne
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't it be better to alternate between high and low-risk tests to cover a wider range of risks? Option D seems more balanced to me.
upvoted 0 times
Goldie
1 year ago
I agree, alternating between high and low-risk tests could help cover a wider range of risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
1 year ago
I think you're right. Option D does seem more balanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
1 year ago
I think we should prioritize testing the high-priority bugs first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice here. It ensures that each product risk gets at least some testing, while prioritizing the tests based on the risk level.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel