Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS TM12 Exam - Topic 3 Question 51 Discussion

Which of the following statements describing the consequences of specifying test conditions at a detailed level is NOT true?Number of correct responses: 1
C) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can require the implementation of an adequate level of formality across the team
A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability
B) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available
D) For system testing, the specification of test conditions at a detailed level, carried out early in the project as soon as the test basis is established, can contribute to defect prevention

BCS TM12 Exam - Topic 3 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TM12 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 3
[All TM12 Questions]

Which of the following statements describing the consequences of specifying test conditions at a detailed level is NOT true?

Number of correct responses: 1

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Karan at May 07, 2022, 06:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Chauncey
8 months ago
Wait, can specifying too much really prevent defects?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
8 months ago
I think B is a bit misleading, we need some requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
8 months ago
I’m not so sure about that, seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
8 months ago
Totally agree, especially in changing environments!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
8 months ago
A detailed level can help with maintainability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
9 months ago
For some reason, I think option D could be misleading; specifying conditions early might not always prevent defects, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
9 months ago
I feel like option C might be the one that's not true, but I can't recall if we covered how formality impacts the team dynamics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
9 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar; we talked about how detailed conditions can be useful when there are no formal requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
9 months ago
I remember discussing how detailed test conditions can help with maintainability, but I'm not sure if that's always true in changing environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
9 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. The cluster key should be the columns with high cardinality, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the Salesforce merge feature. I'll need to carefully read through the options to determine the correct sequence of steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
9 months ago
This is a familiar topic, so I'm feeling confident. I'll go with Merge, Clear and Load, Replace, and Append as my four choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
10 months ago
I remember studying EAP methods, and EAP-AnyConnect seems familiar. Could it be that one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
10 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options here. Approving access to financial systems, developing security awareness content, and interviewing security staff don't seem like typical governance responsibilities. I'll have to think this through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
1 year ago
Detailed test conditions? That's like trying to plan a party where every guest has to bring their own napkin. Good luck with that.
upvoted 0 times
Ozell
1 year ago
C) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can require the implementation of an adequate level of formality across the team
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
B) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
1 year ago
A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mollie
1 year ago
Detailed test conditions, huh? Sounds like a job for a spreadsheet wizard. I bet the person who wrote this question has a Ph.D. in Excel macros.
upvoted 0 times
Alethea
1 year ago
C) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can require the implementation of an adequate level of formality across the team
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
1 year ago
B) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
1 year ago
A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorthy
1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I feel like they're trying to trip us up with all these nuanced statements. Better double-check my answer before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
Sherell
1 year ago
C) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can require the implementation of an adequate level of formality across the team
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
B) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
1 year ago
A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maile
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option D is the winner here. Early defect prevention is always a good thing, even if it means a bit more work upfront. Can't argue with that logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
1 year ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Specifying test conditions at a detailed level can be a double-edged sword. It's great for maintenance, but it requires a lot of formality upfront. Not ideal for fast-paced environments.
upvoted 0 times
Leonida
1 year ago
D) For system testing, the specification of test conditions at a detailed level, carried out early in the project as soon as the test basis is established, can contribute to defect prevention
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
1 year ago
C) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can require the implementation of an adequate level of formality across the team
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 year ago
B) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Albert
1 year ago
But specifying test conditions at a detailed level can help prevent defects, so it can't be C
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
1 year ago
I think the answer is A
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel