A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability
Wait, is this a trick question? I feel like they're trying to trip us up with all these nuanced statements. Better double-check my answer before submitting.
B) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available
A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability
Hmm, I think option D is the winner here. Early defect prevention is always a good thing, even if it means a bit more work upfront. Can't argue with that logic.
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Specifying test conditions at a detailed level can be a double-edged sword. It's great for maintenance, but it requires a lot of formality upfront. Not ideal for fast-paced environments.
D) For system testing, the specification of test conditions at a detailed level, carried out early in the project as soon as the test basis is established, can contribute to defect prevention
B) The specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available
A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability
Becky
24 days agoLinwood
2 days agoMollie
28 days agoDorthy
1 months agoSherell
2 days agoDorothy
4 days agoAaron
16 days agoMaile
1 months agoLeoma
2 months agoLeonida
10 days agoFlorinda
27 days agoGerald
28 days agoRozella
1 months agoAlbert
2 months agoOtis
2 months agoAlbert
2 months ago