New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS ASTQB Exam - Topic 10 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's ASTQB exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 10
[All ASTQB Questions]

Which of the following is a generic tool that would be useful for a mobile application testing project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

C is correct. This is a generic testing tool that would still be useful in a mobile application project. A and B are specific tools that would be designed for use for the specific project. D might work but most generic performance testing tools don't work well for mobile applications because of their inability to work with simulators and provide the variability in network connections.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Louvenia
4 months ago
Nah, performance testing tools are more important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
Wait, can you really use a simulator for all tests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
4 months ago
I think a defect tracking system is essential too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
4 months ago
Definitely an emulator!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
A simulator is great for testing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards a performance testing tool, but I recall some questions where simulators were highlighted as essential too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
5 months ago
A defect tracking system sounds important, but I feel like it might not be the "generic tool" they're asking about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
5 months ago
I remember practicing with emulators in class; they seem like a solid option for testing mobile apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
5 months ago
I think a simulator could be useful, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice for mobile testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
5 months ago
Hmm, the wording of the question is a bit confusing. I'm not entirely sure which command would be the best solution. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
5 months ago
Option D seems a bit risky to me. Deleting the regular implementation class could cause other issues if that class is used elsewhere in the application. I'd be cautious about that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
5 months ago
This is straightforward. The key is to avoid modifying Java parameters and use plugins as much as possible. I'm confident those are the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is an issue with the IP address and mask configuration. The error message suggests the entry is inconsistent, so I'll double-check the IP and subnet mask to make sure they match the VRF1 configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel