New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCI CBCI Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCI's CBCI exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All CBCI Questions]

When establishing a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS), engagement with stakeholders is important. Which of the following is NOT a reason for engaging with internal stakeholders?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Glenna
2 months ago
C makes sense too, but I see why some might disagree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
2 months ago
I think D is the odd one out here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
2 months ago
A is definitely a reason to engage stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
3 months ago
Wait, are we really saying involving stakeholders reduces workload? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
3 months ago
Totally agree with B! Collaboration is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 months ago
I vaguely recall that reducing conflict is a key reason for engagement, but I can't quite remember if that's the only reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify the benefits of stakeholder engagement, and I feel like all the other options make sense except for D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
4 months ago
I think option D sounds off because involving stakeholders is more about collaboration than just reducing workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
4 months ago
I remember discussing how engaging stakeholders helps in identifying existing policies, but I'm not sure if that's the main reason for involving them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
4 months ago
The key here is to focus on the question - it's asking which option is NOT a reason for engaging with internal stakeholders. I think the answer is D, as involving stakeholders to reduce the workload of the Business Continuity Professional doesn't seem like a valid reason for engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. All of these options sound like good reasons to engage with internal stakeholders. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully to figure out which one is the odd one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
4 months ago
I've got this! Engaging stakeholders is crucial for a successful BCMS, so the option that is NOT a reason must be the one about reducing the workload and responsibilities of the Business Continuity Professional. That doesn't seem like a valid reason for engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
4 months ago
Okay, let's see. The options seem to be about reducing duplication, engaging colleagues, reducing conflict, and delegating work. I'm not sure which one is NOT a reason for engaging stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the reasons for engaging with internal stakeholders when establishing a BCMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
6 months ago
Option D seems like a good way to get out of doing work. Who wouldn't want to delegate all the admin stuff to someone else?
upvoted 0 times
Tabetha
5 months ago
User 2: I agree, delegating administrative tasks may save time, but it's crucial for the professional to have a comprehensive understanding of the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
5 months ago
User 1: Option D may seem like a good idea, but it's important for the Business Continuity Professional to be involved in all aspects of the BCMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel