When establishing a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS), engagement with stakeholders is important. Which of the following is NOT a reason for engaging with internal stakeholders?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CBCI Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
17 comments · newest first
GL
Glenna
10 months ago
C makes sense too, but I see why some might disagree.
LY
Lynette
10 months ago
I think D is the odd one out here.
MA
Maryann
10 months ago
A is definitely a reason to engage stakeholders.
NI
Nicolette
10 months ago
Wait, are we really saying involving stakeholders reduces workload? Sounds off.
JA
Jaclyn
10 months ago
Totally agree with B! Collaboration is key!
VI
Viola
11 months ago
I vaguely recall that reducing conflict is a key reason for engagement, but I can't quite remember if that's the only reason.
DI
Diane
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify the benefits of stakeholder engagement, and I feel like all the other options make sense except for D.
LA
Lai
11 months ago
I think option D sounds off because involving stakeholders is more about collaboration than just reducing workload.
HA
Harris
11 months ago
I remember discussing how engaging stakeholders helps in identifying existing policies, but I'm not sure if that's the main reason for involving them.
LE
Leslee
12 months ago
The key here is to focus on the question - it's asking which option is NOT a reason for engaging with internal stakeholders. I think the answer is D, as involving stakeholders to reduce the workload of the Business Continuity Professional doesn't seem like a valid reason for engagement.
JU
Judy
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. All of these options sound like good reasons to engage with internal stakeholders. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully to figure out which one is the odd one out.
KA
Kallie
12 months ago
I've got this! Engaging stakeholders is crucial for a successful BCMS, so the option that is NOT a reason must be the one about reducing the workload and responsibilities of the Business Continuity Professional. That doesn't seem like a valid reason for engagement.
NE
Nell
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The options seem to be about reducing duplication, engaging colleagues, reducing conflict, and delegating work. I'm not sure which one is NOT a reason for engaging stakeholders.
ST
Stefany
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the reasons for engaging with internal stakeholders when establishing a BCMS.
MA
Magda
1 year ago
Option D seems like a good way to get out of doing work. Who wouldn't want to delegate all the admin stuff to someone else?
TA
Tabetha
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, delegating administrative tasks may save time, but it's crucial for the professional to have a comprehensive understanding of the system.
BE
Bettina
1 year ago
User 1: Option D may seem like a good idea, but it's important for the Business Continuity Professional to be involved in all aspects of the BCMS.