New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BACB BCBA Exam - Topic 6 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for BACB's BCBA exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 6
[All BCBA Questions]

If a client exhibits problem behaviors throughout the day and evenings regardless of what is going on in the environment and what activities he/she is participating in, which would be the BEST way to reduce the high frequency and increase latency?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ira
2 months ago
Really? I’m not sure if just reinforcement will cut it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
2 months ago
Totally agree, A makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
3 months ago
I don’t like the idea of punishment at all, it just seems harsh.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
3 months ago
A is definitely the way to go! High rewards for good behavior!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
3 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Reinforcement works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the fixed ratio reinforcer in option D. I wonder if that would really help with latency since it seems more focused on immediate rewards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
4 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question similar to this one, and I think the answer was about reinforcing absence of the problem behavior. So, I might lean towards A as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
4 months ago
I'm not sure about the punishment options. I remember we discussed how punishment can sometimes lead to more problem behaviors. Maybe A is the better choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
4 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar since we talked about differential reinforcement in class. It seems like a good way to encourage positive behavior instead of just punishing the negative ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
4 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking about reducing the frequency of the problem behaviors or increasing the latency (time between occurrences)? I'll need to re-read it carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
4 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is to use a differential reinforcement procedure to reward the absence of problem behaviors. That will be the most effective way to reduce the high frequency and increase the latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on differential reinforcement and punishment techniques to make sure I understand the differences and when each would be appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different reinforcement and punishment procedures carefully to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
7 months ago
I'm a bit surprised that a fixed ratio reinforcer for appropriate behavior is even an option. That's not really going to address the underlying issue. Option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Queenie
5 months ago
B) I agree, using a high magnitude punishment might not address the root cause of the behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
6 months ago
A) Use a differential reinforcement procedure for the absence of problem behaviors for an amount of time with a high magnitude reinforcer as a reward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorathy
7 months ago
Ha! Imagine trying to punish someone for problem behaviors throughout the day and evening. Good luck with that! Option A is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
6 months ago
D) Using a fixed ratio reinforcer could be effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
6 months ago
B) Punishment might not work well for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
7 months ago
A) Use a differential reinforcement procedure for the absence of problem behaviors for an amount of time with a high magnitude reinforcer as a reward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carman
7 months ago
I disagree with using punishment at all. That's just going to make the situation worse. Option A is definitely the way to go, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Marcos
7 months ago
Yes, using positive reinforcement for the absence of problem behaviors seems like a more effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
7 months ago
I agree, punishment can often have unintended consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
7 months ago
I think punishment might not be the best option as it could have unintended consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
7 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe using punishment could work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
8 months ago
I agree with Bulah, using reinforcement for absence of problem behaviors seems like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Punishment can be a tricky thing, but if the problem behaviors are constant, a high magnitude punishment might be the way to go. Option B could be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 months ago
I think the best way would be to use differential reinforcement with a high magnitude reinforcer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
8 months ago
I think option A is the best way to go. Using differential reinforcement to reward the absence of problem behaviors is more effective than punishment-based approaches.
upvoted 0 times
Sheldon
7 months ago
I've seen positive reinforcement work wonders in changing behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
7 months ago
I think option A sounds like a good strategy to try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
7 months ago
I agree, positive reinforcement is usually more effective than punishment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel