When Katie was learning how to stir-fry vegetables, her hand brushed the side of the very hot pan and she now refuses to make stir-fried vegetables. Her refusal is a result oF.
Looks like Katie got a little too hot and bothered in the kitchen! Must have been one sizzling experience. I'd say she's got a case of the 'pan-ic' attacks now.
Oof, that's a tough one. I'm leaning towards B, negative reinforcement. The pain from the burn has reinforced Katie's decision to avoid stir-frying, and now she's being negatively reinforced every time she thinks about it.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. The way I see it, the hot pan was the unconditioned stimulus, and Katie's fear of stir-frying is the conditioned response. So I'd go with C - conditioned punishment.
I'm with Roosevelt on this one. The burn was an involuntary, automatic response to the hot pan, so it's clearly an unconditioned punishment. Katie's learned to avoid that painful experience at all costs!
Ouch, that hot pan must have really left a mark! I'd say it's a case of unconditioned punishment - the pain from the burn was an immediate and unpleasant consequence that has made Katie avoid stir-frying ever since.
Graham
21 days agoJamal
22 days agoBronwyn
23 days agoFrance
1 months agoGladys
1 days agoMalcom
21 days agoSelma
23 days agoBrunilda
26 days agoRoosevelt
2 months agoLinn
15 days agoVallie
25 days agoCarissa
2 months agoFrank
2 months agoLuann
2 months ago