Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 4 Question 25 Discussion

Posted by Ressie on May 03, 2022 at 06:20 AM

Which of the following is the main purpose of the component build and integration strategy?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium CTFL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
BR
Brynn 1 year ago
B makes sense too, gotta interface with other systems!
VE
Veda 1 year ago
Wait, is it really just about combining components? Seems too simple.
RU
Ruth 1 year ago
Definitely agree with E, timing is key!
DU
Dulce 1 year ago
I think it's mainly for testing all the small parts.
AL
Albina 1 year ago
It's all about how to combine components effectively.
TA
Tatum 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'd go with option B and use the Schedule Assistant to find the most suitable resource.
PR
Precious 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure here. The options mention things like completing the design, defining the strategy, and managing the transition, so I'm not 100% sure which one is the primary objective of the Implement stage.
RE
Ressie 1 year ago
Okay, let me take a closer look at the image. The red box seems to be highlighting some kind of numerical value, so I'm guessing it's either a risk score, a source ranking, or an event priority. I'll weigh the options and make my best educated guess.
UL
Ulysses 2 years ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I might just eenie-meenie-miney-moe it and hope for the best. Or maybe I'll ask the cat for its input.
PA
Paulene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ulysses
E) to specify which components to combine when, and how many at once
AU
Audra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ulysses
B) to ensure that the system interfaces to other systems and networks
BR
Brunilda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ulysses
A) to ensure that all of the small components are tested
DE
Deeanna 2 years ago
I'm going with option D. Dividing the software into well-defined components is the foundation of a good integration strategy.
AN
Anabel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Deeanna
I agree, both options D and E play a significant role in the component build and integration strategy.
MI
Mitzie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Deeanna
I think option E is also important. Knowing which components to combine and when is key for integration.
LU
Luann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Deeanna
Option D is a good choice. Dividing the software into components is crucial for integration.
AV
Avery 2 years ago
Option E seems like the way to go. Specifying the component integration strategy is crucial for a successful project.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
↳ replying to Avery
And it also helps in testing all the small components to ensure they work together seamlessly.
AM
Amalia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Avery
Exactly, it's all about making sure the integration testing can be done effectively.
AN
Angelo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Avery
It helps ensure that the system interfaces properly with other systems and networks.
BR
Brittni 1 year ago
↳ replying to Avery
I agree, specifying which components to combine and when is important for a smooth integration process.
SU
Susana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Avery
Yes, specifying the component integration strategy is crucial for a successful project.
LO
Louisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Avery
E) to specify which components to combine when, and how many at once
FR
Freida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Avery
B) to ensure that the system interfaces to other systems and networks
AD
Adolph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Avery
A) to ensure that all of the small components are tested
LE
Leanora 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking option B would be the right answer, but now I'm second-guessing myself. Maybe I need to review the material again.
AL
Alyce 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leanora
User 2: I agree, that sounds like the right answer.
CE
Cecily 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leanora
User 1: I think the main purpose is to ensure that all of the small components are tested.
HE
Herman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leanora
User 2: I agree, option A seems like the right answer.
LA
Launa 2 years ago
↳ replying to Leanora
User 1: I think the main purpose is to ensure that all of the small components are tested.
MA
Marti 2 years ago
I think the main purpose is to ensure that the integration testing can be done efficiently. Option C seems like the best choice here.
DA
Darell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marti
I agree with you, but I also think it's important to ensure that the system interfaces to other systems and networks. Option B covers that aspect.
WY
Wynell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marti
I see your point, but I think it's more about ensuring that all of the small components are tested. Option A seems like the right choice.
KE
Kelvin 2 years ago
↳ replying to Marti
I believe it's actually to specify which components to combine when, and how many at once. Option E makes more sense to me.
ER
Erasmo 2 years ago
↳ replying to Marti
I think the main purpose is to ensure that the integration testing can be done efficiently. Option C seems like the best choice here.
NG
Nguyet 2 years ago
But isn't it also important to specify how the software should be divided into components?
LU
Luz 2 years ago
I agree with Willard, testing all components is crucial for integration.
WI
Willard 2 years ago
I think the main purpose is to ensure that all small components are tested.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel