Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CSSGB Exam - Topic 4 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CSSGB exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 4
[All CSSGB Questions]

The following Business Case is constructed properly.

''During fiscal year 2008 the warranty returns for electric razor Model 312 were 1.3%. This represents a gap of 0.5% over target costing the company $18,500 per month.''

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Larae at Aug 23, 2022, 03:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSSGB Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tuyet
7 months ago
Totally agree, that seems off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
7 months ago
Wait, how does 0.5% lead to that much cost?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
7 months ago
I don't think that's a big enough gap to cost $18,500.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
7 months ago
Sounds like a solid case to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
7 months ago
Warranty returns were only 1.3%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
8 months ago
I practiced a case where the warranty returns were linked directly to customer satisfaction. This one seems to lack that connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the gap should be explained more clearly. It seems like there's missing context here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
8 months ago
I remember a similar question where the focus was on how warranty returns impact profitability. This one feels a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
8 months ago
I think the statement might be misleading because it mentions a gap but doesn't clarify how that affects the overall cost structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about how to allocate the overhead costs between the two products. I'll need to review the information carefully to make sure I understand the approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
8 months ago
Option C seems like a risky move to me. Relying on crowd-sourcing for such a critical application with strict regulatory requirements doesn't seem like a good idea. I think we need to invest in a sustainable test automation strategy, even if it means exploring new tools. Option A seems like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
8 months ago
I practiced similar questions, and I think the formula involves fixed costs plus desired profit, divided by the contribution margin ratio or something like that. Is that right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
8 months ago
I'm uncertain about this one; I thought histograms were related to cumulative data, but now I'm not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
8 months ago
Okay, the shadow price for skilled labor being $0 means it's not a binding constraint. But the shadow price for material A being $11.70 is important - that tells me how much the contribution would increase if I could get an extra unit of that material.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The disadvantage of using grants is that the government can exert more control over the program design, expenditures, and costs. So the correct answer is E - all of the above.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
8 months ago
My notes mentioned something about needing Windows Server Backup, but I'm not positive about the other features needed for Avaya.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel