MENU
During concurrent development., a user reported a problem with Version 1 of the software product. A software quality engineer determined the problem originated m Version 2 of the product. Which of the following actions would be most appropriate for the software quality engineer to take first to fix the problem?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CSQE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
In a concurrent development environment, when a problem is identified in an earlier version (Version 1) that originated in a later version (Version 2), the appropriate action involves managing the code versions effectively. Branching the Version 2 codeline is the most appropriate first step because:
Isolation of Changes: Branching allows for the isolation of the problematic code in Version 2, enabling targeted fixes without affecting ongoing development in other versions.
Concurrent Development: This approach supports concurrent development activities, allowing different teams to work on fixing the issue in Version 2 while continuing development on other versions.
33 comments · newest first
JO
Jovita
10 months ago
Merging into Version 3 seems too far down the line.
RO
Rosenda
11 months ago
Labeling Version 2 as part of Version 1? That sounds odd.
JE
Jennie
11 months ago
Wait, why would you add new functionality to a broken version?
LO
Lorriane
11 months ago
I agree, branching is the way to go!
CO
Corazon
11 months ago
Definitely branch the Version 2 codeline.
CE
Cecil
12 months ago
Labeling Version 2 as part of Version 1 sounds strange. I think that might just complicate things, so I’m leaning towards option B as the best first action.
AL
Altha
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should add new functionality or just fix the existing issue. Option C seems off to me, but I can't recall why.
JO
Joaquin
12 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we had a similar one about fixing bugs in different versions. I feel like merging fixes into the latest version isn't the best first step.
ET
Ethan
1 year ago
I remember we discussed branching in class, so I think option B might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
MI
Mike
1 year ago
Adding new functionality to Version 2 could be risky if the problem is already present there. I think branching the codeline is the safest and most appropriate option.
LA
Lavelle
1 year ago
Labeling Version 2 as part of Version 1 doesn't seem like it would actually fix the underlying issue. We need to address the problem at the source.
WE
Weldon
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Should we really be merging the fix into Version 3 if the problem originated in Version 2? That doesn't seem like the most logical solution.
DI
Dierdre
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think branching the Version 2 codeline would be the best approach to fix the problem without disrupting the other versions.
GE
Geoffrey
1 year ago
This is a good one. I'll start by looking at the instance's boot disk and firewall/network settings, as those are common trouble spots. Then I'll consider the other options to see if any of them seem more relevant based on the specific issue.
DO
Doyle
1 year ago
I believe it's true. Keyframes are necessary to define the movement over time, right?
NO
Noel
2 years ago
I see your point, Gaynell, but I think labeling Version 2 as part of Version 1 could help track the origin of the problem more effectively.
MO
Mozell
2 years ago
I'm just picturing the software quality engineer trying to fix the problem by doing a dance routine. That would be about as effective as some of these other options.
KR
Kristeen
2 years ago
Adding new functionality to Version 2? What is this, a comedy show? We need to focus on resolving the existing problem, not creating more work for ourselves.
ME
Meghann
2 years ago
D) Label Version 2 as part of Version 1
TE
Tegan
2 years ago
Adding new functionality to Version 2? What is this, a comedy show? We need to focus on resolving the existing problem, not creating more work for ourselves.
PA
Paris
2 years ago
B) Branch the Version 2 codeline
EM
Emmett
2 years ago
A) Merge the fix into Version 3.
CA
Callie
2 years ago
Labeling Version 2 as part of Version 1? Now that's just asking for trouble. Talk about confusing the end-users and the development team. Let's keep things organized and fix this properly.
CO
Corazon
2 years ago
B) Branch the Version 2 codeline
CA
Catarina
2 years ago
A) Merge the fix into Version 3.
GA
Gaynell
2 years ago
I disagree. I think merging the fix into Version 3 would be more efficient in the long run.
KA
Kara
2 years ago
I agree with Corinne. Branching the Version 2 codeline would allow for a separate development path to fix the problem.
VI
Viva
2 years ago
I'm not sure merging the fix into Version 3 is the best idea. That might just create more problems down the line. We need to address the issue at its source in Version 2.
GE
Georgeanna
2 years ago
Branching the Version 2 codeline seems like the logical first step to isolate the issue and fix it without disrupting the other versions. This way, we can work on Version 2 without affecting the other releases.
LE
Lettie
2 years ago
Branching the Version 2 codeline seems like the logical first step to isolate the issue and fix it without disrupting the other versions. This way, we can work on Version 2 without affecting the other releases.
LU
Lucina
2 years ago
B) Branch the Version 2 codeline
AU
Audry
2 years ago
A) Merge the fix into Version 3.
CO
Corinne
2 years ago
I think the software quality engineer should branch the Version 2 codeline.