New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CQA Exam - Topic 9 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 9
[All CQA Questions]

The objective evidence supporting an audit observation must be

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cristal at Apr 19, 2023, 05:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gianna
4 months ago
Not sure about this, seems like a lot of paperwork for just an observation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
4 months ago
Nonconformance writing is a must for clarity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
4 months ago
Wait, is it really necessary to mention it to the auditee?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
4 months ago
I disagree, it should be verified by the escort instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
4 months ago
Definitely needs to be recorded on the working papers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
5 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen something similar in our review sessions, and I think it was emphasized that the evidence must be documented properly, which points to option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viki
5 months ago
I’m a bit unsure about this one. I thought mentioning it to the auditee was important too, but I guess that’s not the same as objective evidence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
5 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the importance of documenting findings, so I feel like option A is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
5 months ago
I think the evidence definitely needs to be recorded on the working papers, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the differences between the CloudMCU and VP96 Series uCU. I'll need to review that part carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
5 months ago
This looks pretty straightforward. I think I'll just use the chmod command to set the permissions to 770 on the /archive directory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions that the data needs to be correlated based on a device identifier, but it's not clear if the machine identifier is the same as the device identifier. I'll need to double-check the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
9 months ago
Definitely A. If it's not on the working papers, it might as well not exist. This isn't a ghost hunt, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
9 months ago
A, for sure. Gotta have that paper trail, am I right? Although, I do wonder if the escort could be a good backup just in case. You know, for those 'he said, she said' moments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards C. Mentioning the observation to the auditee seems like a crucial step in the process.
upvoted 0 times
Charisse
8 months ago
I see your point, but B is also crucial for verification purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
8 months ago
C is definitely important for transparency with the auditee.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
8 months ago
I agree, but I feel like D is necessary to address any nonconformances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
9 months ago
I think A is important too, recording on the working papers is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
9 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I know the evidence needs to be documented, but is written as a nonconformance really the right option?
upvoted 0 times
Lashandra
8 months ago
C) mentioned to the auditee
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
8 months ago
B) verified by the escort
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
9 months ago
A) recorded on the working papers
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
11 months ago
I think mentioning the evidence to the auditee is also crucial for transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. The objective evidence must be recorded on the working papers so that it can be reviewed and verified later on.
upvoted 0 times
Kendra
10 months ago
Yes, that way it can be easily reviewed and verified by others during the audit process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
10 months ago
I agree, it's important to have the evidence recorded on the working papers for reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
I agree with Toshia, it's important to have a clear record of the evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
11 months ago
I think the objective evidence should be recorded on the working papers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel