MENU
Which of the following is an audit reporting technique for prioritizing audit findings?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CQA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
LE
Leoma
10 months ago
Wait, cognitive dissonance? How does that even relate to audit findings?
HI
Hildegarde
11 months ago
Totally agree with the risk-benefit ratio! It's straightforward and effective.
VI
Viola
11 months ago
Weibull distribution? Never heard of that in audits before.
TY
Tyra
11 months ago
I think the Ishikawa diagram is more useful for root cause analysis, not prioritizing.
GA
Gayla
11 months ago
Risk-benefit ratio is definitely a solid technique!
RE
Rebecka
12 months ago
Cognitive dissonance seems out of place here; I don't recall it being related to audit techniques at all.
BA
Barrie
12 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question similar to this before, and I think the Weibull distribution was more about reliability analysis than audit reporting.
HE
Hershel
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the Ishikawa diagram being used for root cause analysis, not prioritizing findings.
CA
Carolann
1 year ago
I think the risk-benefit ratio might be the right choice since it helps prioritize findings based on their impact.
BR
Britt
1 year ago
I've got this! The answer is B - risk-benefit ratio. That's a classic technique for prioritizing audit findings based on the potential impact. I'm confident in this one.
LO
Lon
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. None of the options seem like a clear audit reporting technique to me. I'll have to guess and hope for the best on this one.
TH
Thomasena
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Audit reporting techniques are used to communicate and prioritize findings, so the answer is likely one of the options provided. I'm leaning towards B or D, but I'll have to double-check my notes to be sure.
GI
Gianna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know we covered audit reporting techniques in class, but I'm having trouble remembering the specifics. I'll have to think this through carefully.
ME
Melissa
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the answer is B - risk-benefit ratio, as that's a common technique used to prioritize audit findings.
YU
Yun
1 year ago
Okay, the question is asking what the output is showing. Based on the options, it seems like it's related to MPLS labels and BGP. I'll need to review the exhibit and the options to determine the correct answer.
HE
Helene
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward denial of service attack question. The description of the service becoming non-responsive after receiving large messages is a classic symptom.
JU
Jutta
1 year ago
I think SAML is definitely related to authentication patterns, but I'm not so sure about the brokered aspect.
AM
Amber
1 year ago
Cognitive dissonance? That's the theory where people get all weird and defensive when their beliefs are challenged. Definitely not an audit reporting technique!
TH
Theresia
1 year ago
D) Ishikawa diagram
SH
Sherman
1 year ago
B) Risk-benefit ratio
AU
Audria
1 year ago
A) Weibull distribution
AL
Alberto
1 year ago
Wait, is the Weibull distribution related to that weird probability distribution I learned about in stats class? I'm just going to go with my gut and say the risk-benefit ratio.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
Yeah, the Ishikawa diagram is more for identifying root causes of problems.
KA
Kattie
1 year ago
I agree, the risk-benefit ratio is a better choice for prioritizing audit findings.
SA
Sang
1 year ago
I think the Weibull distribution is more about reliability analysis.
DE
Destiny
1 year ago
The Ishikawa diagram is a tool for root cause analysis, not prioritizing audit findings. I'm going with the risk-benefit ratio.
RE
Rebeca
1 year ago
The Weibull distribution and cognitive dissonance are not relevant for this.
JO
Joni
1 year ago
I think the risk-benefit ratio is a good choice for prioritizing audit findings.
DE
Derick
1 year ago
I agree, the Ishikawa diagram is for root cause analysis.
GE
Genevieve
1 year ago
Cognitive dissonance? Really? I don't think that's what we're looking for here. Ishikawa diagram sounds more relevant.
JO
Joanna
1 year ago
Weibull distribution might not be as relevant as Ishikawa diagram for prioritizing audit findings.
CA
Carolynn
1 year ago
Cognitive dissonance doesn't seem like the right choice for audit reporting techniques.
JU
Junita
1 year ago
I think Risk-benefit ratio could also be helpful in this situation.
DO
Dorothy
1 year ago
I agree, Ishikawa diagram is a useful tool for prioritizing audit findings.
AG
Agustin
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Weibull distribution, but the risk-benefit ratio seems like a logical way to prioritize audit findings.
NI
Nina
1 year ago
I think the Ishikawa diagram could also be helpful in organizing audit findings.
LO
Lorrine
1 year ago
I agree, the risk-benefit ratio is a practical approach to prioritize audit findings.
SK
Skye
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Risk-benefit ratio could also be a valid technique.
AN
Andra
2 years ago
I agree with Linwood, Ishikawa diagram helps in prioritizing audit findings.
LI
Linwood
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Ishikawa diagram.