Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CQA Exam - Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 8
[All CQA Questions]

Which of the following is an audit reporting technique for prioritizing audit findings?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Catherin at May 28, 2024, 10:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leoma
6 months ago
Wait, cognitive dissonance? How does that even relate to audit findings?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
6 months ago
Totally agree with the risk-benefit ratio! It's straightforward and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
6 months ago
Weibull distribution? Never heard of that in audits before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
7 months ago
I think the Ishikawa diagram is more useful for root cause analysis, not prioritizing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
7 months ago
Risk-benefit ratio is definitely a solid technique!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
7 months ago
Cognitive dissonance seems out of place here; I don't recall it being related to audit techniques at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
7 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question similar to this before, and I think the Weibull distribution was more about reliability analysis than audit reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the Ishikawa diagram being used for root cause analysis, not prioritizing findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
8 months ago
I think the risk-benefit ratio might be the right choice since it helps prioritize findings based on their impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
8 months ago
I've got this! The answer is B - risk-benefit ratio. That's a classic technique for prioritizing audit findings based on the potential impact. I'm confident in this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. None of the options seem like a clear audit reporting technique to me. I'll have to guess and hope for the best on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Audit reporting techniques are used to communicate and prioritize findings, so the answer is likely one of the options provided. I'm leaning towards B or D, but I'll have to double-check my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know we covered audit reporting techniques in class, but I'm having trouble remembering the specifics. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
8 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the answer is B - risk-benefit ratio, as that's a common technique used to prioritize audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
8 months ago
Okay, the question is asking what the output is showing. Based on the options, it seems like it's related to MPLS labels and BGP. I'll need to review the exhibit and the options to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward denial of service attack question. The description of the service becoming non-responsive after receiving large messages is a classic symptom.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
8 months ago
I think SAML is definitely related to authentication patterns, but I'm not so sure about the brokered aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
Cognitive dissonance? That's the theory where people get all weird and defensive when their beliefs are challenged. Definitely not an audit reporting technique!
upvoted 0 times
Theresia
11 months ago
D) Ishikawa diagram
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
11 months ago
B) Risk-benefit ratio
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
12 months ago
A) Weibull distribution
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alberto
1 year ago
Wait, is the Weibull distribution related to that weird probability distribution I learned about in stats class? I'm just going to go with my gut and say the risk-benefit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
Amie
1 year ago
Yeah, the Ishikawa diagram is more for identifying root causes of problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 year ago
I agree, the risk-benefit ratio is a better choice for prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
1 year ago
I think the Weibull distribution is more about reliability analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Destiny
1 year ago
The Ishikawa diagram is a tool for root cause analysis, not prioritizing audit findings. I'm going with the risk-benefit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
Rebeca
1 year ago
The Weibull distribution and cognitive dissonance are not relevant for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
1 year ago
I think the risk-benefit ratio is a good choice for prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
1 year ago
I agree, the Ishikawa diagram is for root cause analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Genevieve
1 year ago
Cognitive dissonance? Really? I don't think that's what we're looking for here. Ishikawa diagram sounds more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
Joanna
11 months ago
Weibull distribution might not be as relevant as Ishikawa diagram for prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
12 months ago
Cognitive dissonance doesn't seem like the right choice for audit reporting techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
12 months ago
I think Risk-benefit ratio could also be helpful in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
I agree, Ishikawa diagram is a useful tool for prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Agustin
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Weibull distribution, but the risk-benefit ratio seems like a logical way to prioritize audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
Nina
1 year ago
I think the Ishikawa diagram could also be helpful in organizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
1 year ago
I agree, the risk-benefit ratio is a practical approach to prioritize audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Risk-benefit ratio could also be a valid technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
1 year ago
I agree with Linwood, Ishikawa diagram helps in prioritizing audit findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) Ishikawa diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel