Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ Exam CQA Topic 2 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 2
[All CQA Questions]

When a proposed corrective action plan is judged unacceptable, an auditor should do which of the following?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lynsey at Apr 30, 2025, 10:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Evangelina
1 months ago
Option A is the way to go! The auditor should just revise the plan themselves. How hard can it be, right? It's not like the auditee knows their own business or anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe the auditor can flip a coin to decide? Or better yet, ask the auditee to do it - that's their problem now!
upvoted 0 times
Hector
10 hours ago
Definitely. It's a team effort to ensure the plan meets the necessary standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
4 days ago
I agree. It's all about collaboration and making sure the corrective action plan is effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
17 days ago
Yeah, that sounds like the best approach. It's important to communicate and work together to find a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
20 days ago
I think the auditor should discuss the plan's deficiencies with the auditee and request a revised plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blondell
1 months ago
D is my pick. Benchmarking the deficient area is a smart move to get the plan on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
5 days ago
User 3: I still think D is the way to go. Benchmarking can provide valuable insights for improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
6 days ago
User 2: I agree with Bonita. Communication is key in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
1 months ago
User 1: I think C is the best option. Discussing the deficiencies with the auditee is important for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
2 months ago
I believe D is not the best choice because suggesting benchmarking may not address the specific deficiencies in the plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
2 months ago
B sounds good to me. Escalating it to the next level of management will ensure the plan gets the attention it deserves.
upvoted 0 times
Daryl
29 days ago
Yes, it's important to ensure that the corrective action plan is taken seriously.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
1 months ago
I agree, escalating it to the next level of management is the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kandis
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
2 months ago
I agree with Jarod, discussing the deficiencies with the auditee and requesting a revised plan makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
2 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. It's all about open communication and collaboration with the auditee to get a revised plan that works.
upvoted 0 times
Vanda
29 days ago
User 3: I think discussing the deficiencies with the auditee is the most effective way to move forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, open communication is key in situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, option C is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jarod
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel