New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CQA Exam - Topic 4 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 4
[All CQA Questions]

Which of the following is NOT an acceptable method of verifying a corrective action?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Honey at Nov 14, 2024, 07:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Novella
3 months ago
I thought all of these were valid at first, but C really stands out.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
3 months ago
A and B are definitely acceptable methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
3 months ago
Wait, why wouldn't conducting another audit be valid?
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
4 months ago
Totally agree, C doesn't make sense for verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
4 months ago
I think option C is the one that's not acceptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
4 months ago
Collecting new results feels like the most direct way to verify a correction, but I wonder if there are cases where that wouldn't be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
4 months ago
Conducting another audit seems like it could be a good way to verify, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned as acceptable or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to identify acceptable verification methods, and I think contacting individuals was considered valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
5 months ago
I think reviewing measurement records is a standard way to verify corrections, but I'm not sure if it's the only method we should rely on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is B, contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction. That doesn't seem like a valid way to verify the actual results of the corrective action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
5 months ago
Ah, I see. Conducting another audit wouldn't actually verify the specific corrective action that was taken. That makes sense. I think I've got this one figured out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. Reviewing measurement records, contacting responsible individuals, and observing the new results all seem like acceptable ways to verify a corrective action. I'm guessing the answer is conducting another audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll have to think through the different methods of verification and see which one doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about verifying corrective actions. I think I know the answer, but I'll double-check the options to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
1 year ago
Hmm, I don't know. This question seems a bit 'auditing' if you ask me. Get it? Auditing? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Adaline
1 year ago
D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 year ago
C) Conducting another audit on the process or system
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 year ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
1 year ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Susy
1 year ago
Contacting the responsible individuals is a good start, but you can't just take their word for it. Needs to be backed up with data.
upvoted 0 times
Makeda
1 year ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
1 year ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maynard
1 year ago
Collecting or observing the new results is key. Seeing the actual outcome will tell you if the correction worked.
upvoted 0 times
Tawanna
1 year ago
D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
C) Conducting another audit on the process or system
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
1 year ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glynda
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process because that would show if the corrective action was effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
1 year ago
Reviewing measurement records is a good way to check the numbers, but it doesn't give you the full picture. I'd go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
1 year ago
Conducting another audit seems like the way to go. That's the only way to really verify the effectiveness of the corrective action.
upvoted 0 times
Earleen
1 year ago
User 4: Collecting or observing the new results of the process is essential to ensure the corrective action is effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
1 year ago
User 3: Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction could also provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, reviewing measurement records after the correction might not give us the full picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
1 year ago
User 1: I think conducting another audit is the best way to verify the corrective action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
1 year ago
Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction can provide valuable insights into the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
I think reviewing measurement records after the correction is also important to verify the changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
1 year ago
I agree, conducting another audit is crucial to ensure the corrective action was effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caprice
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Conducting another audit on the process or system.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel