MENU
Which of the following is NOT an acceptable method of verifying a corrective action?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CQA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
NO
Novella
10 months ago
I thought all of these were valid at first, but C really stands out.
GE
German
11 months ago
A and B are definitely acceptable methods.
RO
Rosalind
11 months ago
Wait, why wouldn't conducting another audit be valid?
WE
Werner
11 months ago
Totally agree, C doesn't make sense for verification.
NA
Na
11 months ago
I think option C is the one that's not acceptable.
IS
Isabelle
12 months ago
Collecting new results feels like the most direct way to verify a correction, but I wonder if there are cases where that wouldn't be enough.
AL
Alyce
12 months ago
Conducting another audit seems like it could be a good way to verify, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned as acceptable or not.
RO
Rolland
12 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to identify acceptable verification methods, and I think contacting individuals was considered valid.
OR
Ora
1 year ago
I think reviewing measurement records is a standard way to verify corrections, but I'm not sure if it's the only method we should rely on.
ER
Ernest
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is B, contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction. That doesn't seem like a valid way to verify the actual results of the corrective action.
JO
Jordan
1 year ago
Ah, I see. Conducting another audit wouldn't actually verify the specific corrective action that was taken. That makes sense. I think I've got this one figured out.
HO
Holley
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. Reviewing measurement records, contacting responsible individuals, and observing the new results all seem like acceptable ways to verify a corrective action. I'm guessing the answer is conducting another audit.
JA
Jannette
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll have to think through the different methods of verification and see which one doesn't fit.
HU
Huey
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about verifying corrective actions. I think I know the answer, but I'll double-check the options to be sure.
ZI
Zita
2 years ago
Hmm, I don't know. This question seems a bit 'auditing' if you ask me. Get it? Auditing? *winks*
AD
Adaline
2 years ago
D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process
HU
Huey
2 years ago
C) Conducting another audit on the process or system
IS
Isadora
2 years ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
DO
Donte
2 years ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
SU
Susy
2 years ago
Contacting the responsible individuals is a good start, but you can't just take their word for it. Needs to be backed up with data.
MA
Makeda
2 years ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
EV
Eve
2 years ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
MA
Maynard
2 years ago
Collecting or observing the new results is key. Seeing the actual outcome will tell you if the correction worked.
TA
Tawanna
2 years ago
D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process
MI
Micaela
2 years ago
C) Conducting another audit on the process or system
LO
Lorrie
2 years ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
JU
Judy
2 years ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
GL
Glynda
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process because that would show if the corrective action was effective.
LE
Lennie
2 years ago
Reviewing measurement records is a good way to check the numbers, but it doesn't give you the full picture. I'd go with option C.
ED
Eden
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made.
LE
Leanora
2 years ago
Conducting another audit seems like the way to go. That's the only way to really verify the effectiveness of the corrective action.
EA
Earleen
2 years ago
User 4: Collecting or observing the new results of the process is essential to ensure the corrective action is effective.
PH
Phyliss
2 years ago
User 3: Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction could also provide valuable insights.
CL
Clay
2 years ago
User 2: I agree, reviewing measurement records after the correction might not give us the full picture.
DE
Delpha
2 years ago
User 1: I think conducting another audit is the best way to verify the corrective action.
CA
Casey
2 years ago
Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction can provide valuable insights into the process.
SA
Salena
2 years ago
I think reviewing measurement records after the correction is also important to verify the changes.
GL
Glen
2 years ago
I agree, conducting another audit is crucial to ensure the corrective action was effective.
CA
Caprice
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Conducting another audit on the process or system.