Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CQA Exam - Topic 4 Question 103 Discussion

Which of the following is NOT an acceptable method of verifying a corrective action?
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
C) Conducting another audit on the process or system
D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process

ASQ CQA Exam - Topic 4 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 4
[All CQA Questions]

Which of the following is NOT an acceptable method of verifying a corrective action?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Honey at Nov 14, 2024, 07:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Novella
7 months ago
I thought all of these were valid at first, but C really stands out.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
8 months ago
A and B are definitely acceptable methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
8 months ago
Wait, why wouldn't conducting another audit be valid?
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
8 months ago
Totally agree, C doesn't make sense for verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
8 months ago
I think option C is the one that's not acceptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
9 months ago
Collecting new results feels like the most direct way to verify a correction, but I wonder if there are cases where that wouldn't be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
9 months ago
Conducting another audit seems like it could be a good way to verify, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned as acceptable or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
9 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to identify acceptable verification methods, and I think contacting individuals was considered valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
9 months ago
I think reviewing measurement records is a standard way to verify corrections, but I'm not sure if it's the only method we should rely on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is B, contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction. That doesn't seem like a valid way to verify the actual results of the corrective action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
9 months ago
Ah, I see. Conducting another audit wouldn't actually verify the specific corrective action that was taken. That makes sense. I think I've got this one figured out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
9 months ago
Okay, let me see. Reviewing measurement records, contacting responsible individuals, and observing the new results all seem like acceptable ways to verify a corrective action. I'm guessing the answer is conducting another audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll have to think through the different methods of verification and see which one doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about verifying corrective actions. I think I know the answer, but I'll double-check the options to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
2 years ago
Hmm, I don't know. This question seems a bit 'auditing' if you ask me. Get it? Auditing? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Adaline
1 year ago
D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 year ago
C) Conducting another audit on the process or system
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 year ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
2 years ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Susy
2 years ago
Contacting the responsible individuals is a good start, but you can't just take their word for it. Needs to be backed up with data.
upvoted 0 times
Makeda
2 years ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
2 years ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maynard
2 years ago
Collecting or observing the new results is key. Seeing the actual outcome will tell you if the correction worked.
upvoted 0 times
Tawanna
1 year ago
D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 years ago
C) Conducting another audit on the process or system
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
2 years ago
B) Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 years ago
A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glynda
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Collecting or observing the new results of the process because that would show if the corrective action was effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
2 years ago
Reviewing measurement records is a good way to check the numbers, but it doesn't give you the full picture. I'd go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Reviewing measurement records after the correction has been made.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
2 years ago
Conducting another audit seems like the way to go. That's the only way to really verify the effectiveness of the corrective action.
upvoted 0 times
Earleen
2 years ago
User 4: Collecting or observing the new results of the process is essential to ensure the corrective action is effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
2 years ago
User 3: Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction could also provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
2 years ago
User 2: I agree, reviewing measurement records after the correction might not give us the full picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
2 years ago
User 1: I think conducting another audit is the best way to verify the corrective action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
2 years ago
Contacting the individuals responsible for implementing the correction can provide valuable insights into the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 years ago
I think reviewing measurement records after the correction is also important to verify the changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
2 years ago
I agree, conducting another audit is crucial to ensure the corrective action was effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caprice
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Conducting another audit on the process or system.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel