New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASQ CQA Exam - Topic 2 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 2
[All CQA Questions]

The following portion of the test includes several Case Studies. Each Case Study includes introductory information about a specific company or audit situation, followed immediately by a set of questions related to the situation described and various audit-related documents, identified by company name.

All of the audit-related documents for these Case Studies are presented in a separate booklet labeled:

CONFIDENTIAL

Audit Documents

These documents were drawn from actual companies and are designed to be examples of genuine audit materials. Their format and contents have not been altered, and they are intended to represent working documents from everyday situations.

Although the documents for the Case Studies are presented separately, the test will be scored as a whole, on a total of 150 questions. You may go back and check your work on any part of the examination until time is called at the end of the testing period.

Two auditors are conducting an internal audit of the Quality Electronics and Elements Co. (QEE) system procedures. During the first day of the audit, the following observations were made.

* An outbound carton with obvious damage was examined by the auditor on the shipping dock.

* A shipment of six (6) boxes to Allied Supply was returned because the customer-required certifications did not accompany the product.

* Unsigned product verification documents were found on stored products.

* Of three (3) cartons found in the accepted materials station, only two of the cartons had labels indicating their contents. When the auditor pointed this out, a customer service representative immediately affixed the proper label to the one unlabeled carton.

* The auditor also found that ''Accepted Material Traveler Cards'' were not attached to any of the cartons in the accepted materials station.

The auditor's finding on products without ''Accepted Material Traveler Cards'' should be written against which of the following departments?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rana
4 months ago
This is why audits are so important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
4 months ago
Wait, no Accepted Material Traveler Cards? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
4 months ago
I disagree, it should be on Production Control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
4 months ago
Definitely a Quality Assurance issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
4 months ago
Sounds like a mess with those unlabeled cartons!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
I recall a case where labeling was crucial for tracking. I think it’s definitely a Production Control issue since they should ensure all materials are properly documented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about this one. I thought Engineering might have some responsibility here too, but now I’m leaning towards Quality Assurance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
5 months ago
This reminds me of a question we did on departmental responsibilities. I feel like Production Control could be the right answer since they handle the materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
5 months ago
I remember we practiced a similar case where missing documentation was a key issue. I think it might relate to Quality Assurance, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
5 months ago
I think I know the difference between directives and regulations, but I want to make sure I have it right. I'll read through the question carefully and consider the options before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Uricosuric agents work by inhibiting the reabsorption of uric acid in the proximal tubules, so the best example would be sulphinpyrazone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
5 months ago
This is a good review question. I'll take my time, re-read the options carefully, and use the process of elimination to narrow it down to the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I know enterprise security policies cover a lot of different areas, but I'm not sure which one would be the most likely to be included. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel