Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CQA Exam - Topic 2 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQA exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 2
[All CQA Questions]

When a proposed corrective action plan is judged unacceptable, an auditor should do which of the following?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lynsey at Apr 30, 2025, 10:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dominque
5 months ago
Wait, can the auditor really revise the plan? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
Totally agree, C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
6 months ago
D could work, but it feels like extra work for the auditee.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
6 months ago
B seems a bit harsh, they should have a chance to fix it first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
6 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Discussing deficiencies makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
6 months ago
I recall something about suggesting benchmarks, but I don't think that's the first step. It feels like the auditor should first address the issues directly with the auditee, which points to option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the auditor should engage with the auditee directly. So, I would lean towards option C again, but I'm not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like revising the plan myself isn't the auditor's role. Maybe it's better to ask the auditee for a new plan? That could be option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
7 months ago
I think I remember that when a plan is unacceptable, the auditor should discuss the deficiencies with the auditee. It seems like option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
7 months ago
This is a tricky one. I don't think the auditor should just revise the plan themselves, since that wouldn't involve the auditee. And benchmarking the deficient area seems like an extra step that might not be necessary. I'm probably going to go with option B - notifying the auditee and requesting a new plan from the next level of management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
7 months ago
Okay, for this type of question, I usually try to identify the most collaborative and constructive solution. Based on that, I'm leaning towards option C - discussing the plan's deficiencies with the auditee and requesting a revised plan. That seems like the best way to work together to address the issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. There are a few options that seem reasonable, like discussing the deficiencies with the auditee or requesting a new plan from a higher level of management. I'll need to think through the nuances of each choice to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about how an auditor should respond when a corrective action plan is unacceptable. I think the key is to focus on the options that involve communicating with the auditee to get a revised plan, rather than the auditor trying to revise it themselves.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
11 months ago
Option A is the way to go! The auditor should just revise the plan themselves. How hard can it be, right? It's not like the auditee knows their own business or anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe the auditor can flip a coin to decide? Or better yet, ask the auditee to do it - that's their problem now!
upvoted 0 times
Hector
10 months ago
Definitely. It's a team effort to ensure the plan meets the necessary standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
10 months ago
I agree. It's all about collaboration and making sure the corrective action plan is effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
11 months ago
Yeah, that sounds like the best approach. It's important to communicate and work together to find a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
11 months ago
I think the auditor should discuss the plan's deficiencies with the auditee and request a revised plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blondell
12 months ago
D is my pick. Benchmarking the deficient area is a smart move to get the plan on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
10 months ago
User 3: I still think D is the way to go. Benchmarking can provide valuable insights for improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
10 months ago
User 2: I agree with Bonita. Communication is key in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
11 months ago
User 1: I think C is the best option. Discussing the deficiencies with the auditee is important for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
12 months ago
I believe D is not the best choice because suggesting benchmarking may not address the specific deficiencies in the plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
12 months ago
B sounds good to me. Escalating it to the next level of management will ensure the plan gets the attention it deserves.
upvoted 0 times
Daryl
11 months ago
Yes, it's important to ensure that the corrective action plan is taken seriously.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
11 months ago
I agree, escalating it to the next level of management is the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kandis
12 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
12 months ago
I agree with Jarod, discussing the deficiencies with the auditee and requesting a revised plan makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
1 year ago
I think option C is the way to go. It's all about open communication and collaboration with the auditee to get a revised plan that works.
upvoted 0 times
Vanda
11 months ago
User 3: I think discussing the deficiencies with the auditee is the most effective way to move forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
12 months ago
User 2: Definitely, open communication is key in situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
12 months ago
User 1: I agree, option C is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jarod
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel