MENU
An undercover investigation has yielded enough information to allow the operative to be removed. What is the correct procedure m removing the operative?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium ASIS-PCI Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
LE
Leota
10 months ago
I disagree, sometimes you need to keep them in place longer.
SI
Simona
11 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, isn’t it obvious?
DE
Derick
11 months ago
Wait, are we really saying C is a good idea? That seems risky.
TA
Tamra
11 months ago
Totally agree with D, time is critical!
CA
Catina
11 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense.
LA
Lazaro
12 months ago
I recall something about never leaving the operative in place if there's any risk, which could relate to option C, but I’m not completely confident.
JO
Joseph
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the operative should be removed quickly, so maybe option D is the right choice?
OC
Octavio
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like it’s crucial to have a plausible explanation for their removal, which makes option A seem reasonable.
LI
Lindsey
1 year ago
I think I remember that the operative should be removed before any interviews happen, so I might lean towards option B.
LA
Lavonna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C says the operative should never remain in place, but that seems a bit extreme. I'll need to think this through carefully.
CA
Casey
1 year ago
Whoa, this is a delicate situation. I'm leaning towards option B - removing the operative before any interviews take place. That seems like the safest way to protect the operative's cover.
IR
Irma
1 year ago
Ah, this is a sensitive situation. I think the best approach is to remove the operative with a plausible explanation, as option A suggests. That way, we can maintain the integrity of the investigation.
SH
Sheldon
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The key seems to be removing the operative in a way that doesn't compromise the investigation. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option.
EM
Emmett
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the potential consequences of each approach.
CL
Clemencia
2 years ago
I think A is the way to go. The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, so as not to raise any suspicions.
HE
Hector
2 years ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
BL
Blythe
2 years ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
DE
Devora
2 years ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher. I'll just go with the most dramatic option, C. The operative should never remain in place, no matter what!
MA
Marg
2 years ago
User 4: Yeah, better safe than sorry when it comes to undercover work.
KR
Kristel
2 years ago
User 3: Definitely, we can't risk the operative's cover being compromised.
ME
Melvin
2 years ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to act quickly in these situations.
PE
Peggie
2 years ago
User 1: I think the operative should be removed as soon as possible.
JI
Jimmie
2 years ago
I think the operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender. This way, it can help maintain the cover story for future operations.
CO
Cory
2 years ago
I agree with Ressie. It's important to remove the operative quickly to prevent any potential harm.
RE
Ressie
2 years ago
I think the operative should be removed as soon as possible.
WA
Wayne
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. The operative should be removed before any interviews take place, right?
WA
Wade
2 years ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
GE
Georgene
2 years ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
LA
Laticia
2 years ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
RH
Rhea
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C might be the best option. The operative shouldn't remain in place even if their cover story hasn't been compromised.
MA
Maryanne
2 years ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
VE
Veronika
2 years ago
D) The operative should be removed as soon as possible
LU
Luis
2 years ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
BE
Beckie
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D. The operative should be removed as soon as possible to minimize the risk of exposure.
DO
Dottie
2 years ago
D) The operative should be removed as soon as possible
RA
Raul
2 years ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
VI
Virgina
2 years ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
GI
Gilma
2 years ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender