Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASIS-PCI Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

An undercover investigation has yielded enough information to allow the operative to be removed. What is the correct procedure m removing the operative?
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
D) The operative should be removed as soon as possible

ASIS-PCI Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's ASIS-PCI exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All ASIS-PCI Questions]

An undercover investigation has yielded enough information to allow the operative to be removed. What is the correct procedure m removing the operative?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leota
7 months ago
I disagree, sometimes you need to keep them in place longer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
8 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, isn’t it obvious?
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
8 months ago
Wait, are we really saying C is a good idea? That seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
8 months ago
Totally agree with D, time is critical!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
8 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
9 months ago
I recall something about never leaving the operative in place if there's any risk, which could relate to option C, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the operative should be removed quickly, so maybe option D is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like it’s crucial to have a plausible explanation for their removal, which makes option A seem reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
9 months ago
I think I remember that the operative should be removed before any interviews happen, so I might lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C says the operative should never remain in place, but that seems a bit extreme. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
9 months ago
Whoa, this is a delicate situation. I'm leaning towards option B - removing the operative before any interviews take place. That seems like the safest way to protect the operative's cover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
9 months ago
Ah, this is a sensitive situation. I think the best approach is to remove the operative with a plausible explanation, as option A suggests. That way, we can maintain the integrity of the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
9 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key seems to be removing the operative in a way that doesn't compromise the investigation. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
9 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the potential consequences of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
2 years ago
I think A is the way to go. The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, so as not to raise any suspicions.
upvoted 0 times
Hector
2 years ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
2 years ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devora
2 years ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher. I'll just go with the most dramatic option, C. The operative should never remain in place, no matter what!
upvoted 0 times
Marg
2 years ago
User 4: Yeah, better safe than sorry when it comes to undercover work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
2 years ago
User 3: Definitely, we can't risk the operative's cover being compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 years ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to act quickly in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 years ago
User 1: I think the operative should be removed as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jimmie
2 years ago
I think the operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender. This way, it can help maintain the cover story for future operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
2 years ago
I agree with Ressie. It's important to remove the operative quickly to prevent any potential harm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 years ago
I think the operative should be removed as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. The operative should be removed before any interviews take place, right?
upvoted 0 times
Wade
2 years ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
2 years ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
2 years ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rhea
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C might be the best option. The operative shouldn't remain in place even if their cover story hasn't been compromised.
upvoted 0 times
Maryanne
2 years ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
2 years ago
D) The operative should be removed as soon as possible
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 years ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beckie
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D. The operative should be removed as soon as possible to minimize the risk of exposure.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
2 years ago
D) The operative should be removed as soon as possible
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
2 years ago
C) The operative should never remain in place even If their cover story has not been compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 years ago
B) The operative should be removed prior to any Interviews taking place with suspected offenders
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
2 years ago
A) The operative should be removed with a plausible explanation, preferably when named as an offender
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel