New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASIS-CPP Exam - Topic 1 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's ASIS-CPP exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 1
[All ASIS-CPP Questions]

There is ample evidence that private policing can deliver more efficient services at a lower cost. Savings are typically based on which of the following?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dulce
4 months ago
C is just wrong, we need results-focused approaches!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
4 months ago
A seems off, less precise allocation doesn't save money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure private policing is really cheaper? Sounds sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
4 months ago
Totally agree with B! Makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
4 months ago
I think it's definitely B, more incentives for providers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
5 months ago
I’m confused about the options, but I don’t think less flexible use of labor is a reason for savings, so I’d rule out option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
5 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and it emphasized results over processes, which makes me lean towards option B again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the savings might come from less precise allocation of responsibility, like in option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
5 months ago
I remember discussing how private policing often has more incentives for performance, so I think option B could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
5 months ago
I vaguely recall that private policing focuses more on results rather than strict processes. So, I wonder if option C might be misleading in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
5 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this where we talked about the flexibility of labor in private policing. I think that might connect to option D, but I’m not sure if that’s the right angle here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the savings could also come from less precise allocation of responsibility. It seems like that could lead to cost-cutting, but I'm not confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
5 months ago
I remember discussing how private policing often has more incentives for providers, which could lead to better efficiency. I think that might relate to option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options don't seem very clear to me. I'll need to review my Android development notes to see if I can figure out where the app is registered with the Android Backup Service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Equivalence Partitioning seems like the most likely technique to find different types of defects in the interfaces between components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
5 months ago
I'm not sure I have enough information to fully solve this. The question mentions a 20% reduction and then a 20% increase, but it's not clear if those percentages are based on the original 1,000 employees or the reduced number. I'd need to clarify that before I could give a definitive answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
5 months ago
Hmm, this one's a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read the question and options to determine if the underlined text is correct or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
10 months ago
Ugh, this question is like a bad joke. Private policing, more efficient? Next they'll tell us unicorns have better crime-fighting skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
10 months ago
I'm gonna go with D) Less flexible use of labor. That's probably code for 'underpaid and overworked'.
upvoted 0 times
Sabrina
8 months ago
I'm gonna go with D) Less flexible use of labor. That's probably code for 'underpaid and overworked'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
8 months ago
D) Less flexible use of labor
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
8 months ago
C) More constraint on processes and less focus on results
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
8 months ago
B) More incentives and penalties for the provider
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
9 months ago
A) Less precise allocation of responsibility
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
10 months ago
B) More incentives and penalties for the provider? Sounds like they're just trying to squeeze every penny out of us.
upvoted 0 times
Roselle
8 months ago
Erick: I'm not so sure, I think it's just a way for them to make more money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
8 months ago
User 3: But maybe it could lead to better services if they have more incentives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
8 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's all about profit for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
8 months ago
User 1: I agree, it does seem like they're trying to cut costs at our expense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
9 months ago
D) Less flexible use of labor
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
9 months ago
C) More constraint on processes and less focus on results
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
9 months ago
B) More incentives and penalties for the provider
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
10 months ago
A) Less precise allocation of responsibility
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlene
10 months ago
Wow, really? Private policing more efficient? That's like saying a fox is better at guarding the henhouse.
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
10 months ago
B) More incentives and penalties for the provider
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
10 months ago
A) Less precise allocation of responsibility
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Layla
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Less flexible use of labor. That could lead to cost savings as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
11 months ago
I agree with Anisha, having more incentives and penalties can drive better performance and cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) More incentives and penalties for the provider.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel