MENU
There is ample evidence that private policing can deliver more efficient services at a lower cost. Savings are typically based on which of the following?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium ASIS-CPP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
DU
Dulce
11 months ago
C is just wrong, we need results-focused approaches!
CH
Cheryll
11 months ago
A seems off, less precise allocation doesn't save money.
MA
Marcos
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure private policing is really cheaper? Sounds sketchy.
RU
Rueben
12 months ago
Totally agree with B! Makes sense.
EL
Elizabeth
12 months ago
I think it's definitely B, more incentives for providers.
KA
Kallie
1 year ago
I’m confused about the options, but I don’t think less flexible use of labor is a reason for savings, so I’d rule out option D.
AR
Art
1 year ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and it emphasized results over processes, which makes me lean towards option B again.
MI
Mila
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the savings might come from less precise allocation of responsibility, like in option A.
HA
Haydee
1 year ago
I remember discussing how private policing often has more incentives for performance, so I think option B could be the right choice.
RI
Ricarda
1 year ago
I vaguely recall that private policing focuses more on results rather than strict processes. So, I wonder if option C might be misleading in this context.
SI
Sina
1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this where we talked about the flexibility of labor in private policing. I think that might connect to option D, but I’m not sure if that’s the right angle here.
ME
Melvin
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the savings could also come from less precise allocation of responsibility. It seems like that could lead to cost-cutting, but I'm not confident.
AI
Ailene
1 year ago
I remember discussing how private policing often has more incentives for providers, which could lead to better efficiency. I think that might relate to option B.
JA
Janessa
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options don't seem very clear to me. I'll need to review my Android development notes to see if I can figure out where the app is registered with the Android Backup Service.
GR
Gretchen
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Equivalence Partitioning seems like the most likely technique to find different types of defects in the interfaces between components.
CA
Catherin
1 year ago
I'm not sure I have enough information to fully solve this. The question mentions a 20% reduction and then a 20% increase, but it's not clear if those percentages are based on the original 1,000 employees or the reduced number. I'd need to clarify that before I could give a definitive answer.
NE
Nettie
1 year ago
Hmm, this one's a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read the question and options to determine if the underlined text is correct or not.
LY
Lyndia
1 year ago
Ugh, this question is like a bad joke. Private policing, more efficient? Next they'll tell us unicorns have better crime-fighting skills.
MA
Martina
1 year ago
I'm gonna go with D) Less flexible use of labor. That's probably code for 'underpaid and overworked'.
SA
Sabrina
1 year ago
I'm gonna go with D) Less flexible use of labor. That's probably code for 'underpaid and overworked'.
CR
Cristina
1 year ago
D) Less flexible use of labor
AH
Ahmad
1 year ago
C) More constraint on processes and less focus on results
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
B) More incentives and penalties for the provider
CA
Casie
1 year ago
A) Less precise allocation of responsibility
AR
Arlette
1 year ago
B) More incentives and penalties for the provider? Sounds like they're just trying to squeeze every penny out of us.
RO
Roselle
1 year ago
Erick: I'm not so sure, I think it's just a way for them to make more money.
CL
Clorinda
1 year ago
User 3: But maybe it could lead to better services if they have more incentives.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it's all about profit for them.
BE
Bernardine
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, it does seem like they're trying to cut costs at our expense.
RO
Roslyn
1 year ago
D) Less flexible use of labor
GL
Glendora
1 year ago
C) More constraint on processes and less focus on results
GL
Gladis
1 year ago
B) More incentives and penalties for the provider
DA
Daniela
1 year ago
A) Less precise allocation of responsibility
PE
Pearlene
1 year ago
Wow, really? Private policing more efficient? That's like saying a fox is better at guarding the henhouse.
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
B) More incentives and penalties for the provider
WI
Wilford
1 year ago
A) Less precise allocation of responsibility
LA
Layla
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Less flexible use of labor. That could lead to cost savings as well.
ME
Melinda
2 years ago
I agree with Anisha, having more incentives and penalties can drive better performance and cost savings.
AN
Anisha
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) More incentives and penalties for the provider.