Wait, the Messaging Metadata pattern requires a messaging framework that can handle metadata? Sounds like a lot of hot air to me. Can we just send the messages without all the fancy bells and whistles?
True, true, the Messaging Metadata pattern is all about leveraging message headers and properties. Without that capability, the whole pattern falls apart. Time to brush up on my messaging framework knowledge!
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I know the Messaging Metadata pattern is all about attaching additional data to messages, but I'm not clear on the specific requirements for the messaging framework. Guess I'll have to do some more research.
I'm not so sure about that. Isn't the Messaging Metadata pattern more about the data itself rather than the underlying messaging framework? I'll have to double-check the details on this one.
Absolutely, the Messaging Metadata pattern requires a messaging framework that can handle message headers or properties. This is crucial for the pattern to work effectively.
I think the Messaging Metadata pattern does require a messaging framework that supports processing messages with headers or properties, so I chose True.
Graciela
26 days agoMicaela
29 days agoAlton
21 days agoAmie
1 months agoJanna
20 hours agoEun
20 days agoAdela
28 days agoGerman
1 months agoNelida
1 months agoErick
1 months agoLeatha
2 months agoJudy
26 days agoTamar
29 days agoGolda
2 months agoJuan
2 months agoGolda
2 months ago