Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.05 Topic 1 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.05 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 1
[All S90.05 Questions]

One of your developers was asked to build a Customer Balance service that is able to update a customer's outstanding account balance. Service consumers need to be able to send messages to the service with an element named "updateCustomerBalance" that contains a "newBalance" child element. You are presented with the following WSDL definition:

What's wrong with this WSDL definition?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Irma
20 days ago
Option B is also incorrect. The 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is actually the correct choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
23 days ago
Haha, the 'xsdxomplexType' element is missing a 'name' attribute? Somebody needs to proofread their WSDL more carefully!
upvoted 0 times
Yvette
2 days ago
User 2: They definitely need to fix that before deploying the service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
3 days ago
User 1: Yeah, that's a pretty big oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuonne
30 days ago
I agree with Gilbert. The WSDL definition should use the 'element' attribute to specify the message structure, rather than the 'type' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
Sarina
8 days ago
A) The prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilbert
2 months ago
The correct answer is C. The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute. This is a common issue with WSDL definitions, as the 'element' attribute is more appropriate for defining the message structure.
upvoted 0 times
Alva
2 days ago
B) The 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
15 days ago
B: The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
18 days ago
A: The prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 months ago
A) The prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carline
2 months ago
I think the 'xsdxomplexType' element is missing a 'name' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
I agree with Joesph, the 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 months ago
I think the issue is with the 'part' element.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel