Arcitura Education S90.05 Exam - Topic 1 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.05 exam

Question #: 43
Topic #: 1

One of your developers was asked to build a Customer Balance service that is able to update a customer's outstanding account balance. Service consumers need to be able to send messages to the service with an element named "updateCustomerBalance" that contains a "newBalance" child element. You are presented with the following WSDL definition:

What's wrong with this WSDL definition?

AThe prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.

BThe 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is incorrect.

CThe 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.

DThe 'xsdxomplexType' element is missing a 'name' attribute.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Mira at Jan 12, 2025, 07:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.05 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Teddy

3 months ago

The missing 'name' attribute is definitely a problem!

upvoted 0 times

...

Miesha

3 months ago

I think the 'document' style is actually correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heike

3 months ago

Wait, is the prefix really wrong? I thought it was fine.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alica

4 months ago

Totally agree with that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

4 months ago

The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.

upvoted 0 times

...

Soledad

4 months ago

I thought the 'xsd:complexType' needing a 'name' attribute was a common mistake in WSDL definitions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittney

4 months ago

This question feels familiar; I think we practiced something similar where the 'style' attribute was a key point.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think the namespace prefix might be off in this WSDL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordie

5 months ago

I remember something about the 'part' element needing an 'element' attribute for proper message structure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carisa

5 months ago

Wait, is the 'xsdxomplexType' element missing a 'name' attribute? I'm not entirely sure about that one. I'll need to review my notes to be confident in my answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

5 months ago

The 'part' element with the 'type' attribute is definitely an issue. I remember from the lectures that it should use the 'element' attribute instead. I'll make sure to mark that as the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute. I'll need to double-check the SOAP specification to make sure I understand that part correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

5 months ago

This WSDL definition looks pretty straightforward. I think I can tackle this question without too much trouble.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irma

10 months ago

Option B is also incorrect. The 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is actually the correct choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonna

10 months ago

Haha, the 'xsdxomplexType' element is missing a 'name' attribute? Somebody needs to proofread their WSDL more carefully!

upvoted 0 times

Diane

9 months ago

Yvette: Agreed, a small mistake like that can cause big issues down the line.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yvette

9 months ago

User 2: They definitely need to fix that before deploying the service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

9 months ago

User 1: Yeah, that's a pretty big oversight.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuonne

10 months ago

I agree with Gilbert. The WSDL definition should use the 'element' attribute to specify the message structure, rather than the 'type' attribute.

upvoted 0 times

Alaine

8 months ago

C) The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

8 months ago

B) The 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is incorrect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarina

9 months ago

A) The prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilbert

10 months ago

The correct answer is C. The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute. This is a common issue with WSDL definitions, as the 'element' attribute is more appropriate for defining the message structure.

upvoted 0 times