Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.05 Exam - Topic 1 Question 43 Discussion

One of your developers was asked to build a Customer Balance service that is able to update a customer's outstanding account balance. Service consumers need to be able to send messages to the service with an element named "updateCustomerBalance" that contains a "newBalance" child element. You are presented with the following WSDL definition:What's wrong with this WSDL definition?
D) The 'xsdxomplexType' element is missing a 'name' attribute.
A) The prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.
B) The 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is incorrect.
C) The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.

Arcitura Education S90.05 Exam - Topic 1 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.05 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 1
[All S90.05 Questions]

One of your developers was asked to build a Customer Balance service that is able to update a customer's outstanding account balance. Service consumers need to be able to send messages to the service with an element named "updateCustomerBalance" that contains a "newBalance" child element. You are presented with the following WSDL definition:

What's wrong with this WSDL definition?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Mira at Jan 12, 2025, 07:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.05 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Teddy
9 months ago
The missing 'name' attribute is definitely a problem!
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
9 months ago
I think the 'document' style is actually correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
10 months ago
Wait, is the prefix really wrong? I thought it was fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
10 months ago
Totally agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
10 months ago
The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
10 months ago
I thought the 'xsd:complexType' needing a 'name' attribute was a common mistake in WSDL definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
11 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we practiced something similar where the 'style' attribute was a key point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the namespace prefix might be off in this WSDL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
11 months ago
I remember something about the 'part' element needing an 'element' attribute for proper message structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
11 months ago
Wait, is the 'xsdxomplexType' element missing a 'name' attribute? I'm not entirely sure about that one. I'll need to review my notes to be confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
11 months ago
The 'part' element with the 'type' attribute is definitely an issue. I remember from the lectures that it should use the 'element' attribute instead. I'll make sure to mark that as the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute. I'll need to double-check the SOAP specification to make sure I understand that part correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
11 months ago
This WSDL definition looks pretty straightforward. I think I can tackle this question without too much trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
1 year ago
Option B is also incorrect. The 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is actually the correct choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 year ago
Haha, the 'xsdxomplexType' element is missing a 'name' attribute? Somebody needs to proofread their WSDL more carefully!
upvoted 0 times
Diane
1 year ago
Yvette: Agreed, a small mistake like that can cause big issues down the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
1 year ago
User 2: They definitely need to fix that before deploying the service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, that's a pretty big oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuonne
1 year ago
I agree with Gilbert. The WSDL definition should use the 'element' attribute to specify the message structure, rather than the 'type' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
1 year ago
C) The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 year ago
B) The 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
1 year ago
A) The prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilbert
1 year ago
The correct answer is C. The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute. This is a common issue with WSDL definitions, as the 'element' attribute is more appropriate for defining the message structure.
upvoted 0 times
Georgiann
1 year ago
C) The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 year ago
B) The 'document' value of the 'soap:binding' element's 'style' attribute is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
B: The 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute instead of the 'type' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
1 year ago
A: The prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 year ago
A) The prefix used for one of the namespaces is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carline
1 year ago
I think the 'xsdxomplexType' element is missing a 'name' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
I agree with Joesph, the 'part' element should have an 'element' attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
1 year ago
I think the issue is with the 'part' element.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel