Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam

Question #: 87
Topic #: 4

I would like to extend my WSDL definition to include a programmatically consumable statement that communicates that upon receiving a message the service will add an entry to an event log. Which technology should I use? Select the correct answer.

AMashup

BXSLT

CREST

DNone of the above.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Laticia at Jan 23, 2025, 10:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alise

3 months ago

Mashups are cool, but not for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aja

3 months ago

None of the above? Really? That sounds odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

3 months ago

Wait, why not just use XSLT? Seems like it could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karina

4 months ago

Totally agree, REST is super flexible!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

4 months ago

I think REST is the way to go for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dierdre

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards "None of the above" because it feels like none of these options directly address extending WSDL for event logging.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerrie

4 months ago

REST seems like a possible option since it’s about web services, but I’m not confident it directly applies to WSDL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

4 months ago

I feel like XSLT might be used for transforming XML, but I don't see how it relates to extending WSDL for logging.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dexter

5 months ago

I think I remember that WSDL is related to SOAP services, but I'm not sure which technology fits best for logging events.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I know WSDL is used to define web service interfaces, but I'm not sure how the event logging piece fits in. Maybe I should review my notes on WSDL extensions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards REST since that's a common way to expose web services, but I'm not 100% sure if it's the best fit for this specific requirement. Guess I'll have to weigh the pros and cons.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maybelle

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure XSLT is used for transforming XML, not for defining service capabilities, so that's probably not the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edmond

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they relate to WSDL and event logging.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

10 months ago

Wait, wait, wait. You're telling me I can't use a Trebuchet to launch the event log entry into the WSDL? Dang, there goes my dream of becoming a WSDL catapult engineer.

upvoted 0 times

Sheldon

8 months ago

C) REST

upvoted 0 times

...

Precious

9 months ago

B) XSLT

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolando

10 months ago

A) Mashup

upvoted 0 times

...

Paul

10 months ago

I'm pretty sure the correct answer is Ouija board. You know, to summon the WSDL spirits and get them to add the event log entry for you. It's the only way to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

Dion

8 months ago

D) None of the above.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deane

8 months ago

C) REST

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavera

8 months ago

B) XSLT

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

9 months ago

A) Mashup

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

10 months ago

I'm just going to go with D and call it a day. Anything else feels like I'm trying too hard. Hey, at least I won't get my hand stuck in the event log, right?

upvoted 0 times

Hermila

9 months ago

User4: D it is, no need to overcomplicate things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

9 months ago

User3: Agreed, let's go with D and keep it simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maricela

10 months ago

User2: Yeah, D seems like the simplest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

10 months ago

User1: I think D is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

10 months ago

Hold up, are we really considering REST for this? That's like using a hammer to fix a clock. I'd go with D, none of the above. This seems like a job for something more specific to WSDL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. XSLT is more for transforming XML, not necessarily adding new functionality. Maybe a REST approach would be better?

upvoted 0 times

...

Miesha

10 months ago

Hmm, that's a valid point. But I still think C) REST is the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlee

10 months ago

I think XSLT would be the way to go. It's designed to transform XML documents, and that seems like the perfect fit for extending the WSDL definition.

upvoted 0 times

Dana

9 months ago

User2: REST might also be a good option for adding an entry to an event log upon receiving a message.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrinne

10 months ago

User1: I agree, XSLT is the best choice for extending the WSDL definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oliva

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is B) XSLT because it is used for transforming XML documents.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miesha

11 months ago

I think the correct answer is C) REST because it is commonly used for web services.

upvoted 0 times

...