APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam - Topic 3 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 3

Resources are limited. The Sales Manager has two marketing assistants who

may be able to give a few hours a week between them to the project.

What action should the Project Manager take?

ATry to secure formal agreement as to how many hours per week the
marketing assistants will spend on the project.

BAccept that members of the Solution Development Team will be
inconsistent.

CMake each Timebox as long as possible to ensure the marketing
assistants have enough time to complete any work allocated to them
within the boundaries of the Timebox.

DSchedule the two marketing assistants to work at different times so they
can hand matters over to one another.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

In the context of Agile Project Management, it is crucial to have clear commitments regarding team members' availability to ensure that project planning and execution can be as accurate and effective as possible. By securing a formal agreement on the hours the marketing assistants can dedicate to the project each week, the Project Manager can better plan tasks and allocate resources, thereby optimizing the team's capacity and ensuring that project timelines and deliverables are realistic and achievable.

The Agile Project Management (AgilePM) framework emphasizes the importance of clear communication, resource planning, and commitment from all team members to ensure project success. Having a formal agreement on availability helps in setting clear expectations and allows for more effective planning and utilization of resources within the constraints of the project, aligning with Agile principles of collaboration, adaptability, and iterative progress.

by Rusty at Sep 19, 2024, 08:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AgilePM-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Caprice

3 months ago

Wait, can they really only spare a few hours? That seems low!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

3 months ago

Making Timeboxes longer sounds like a recipe for delays.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

3 months ago

Not sure if scheduling them at different times is the best idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilda

4 months ago

Totally agree, otherwise it’s just chaos!

upvoted 0 times

...

Yan

4 months ago

I think securing formal agreement is essential.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lino

4 months ago

Scheduling the assistants at different times sounds like a good idea, but I wonder if that would actually lead to effective handovers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused about option C. Making Timeboxes longer seems risky if the assistants can't commit enough hours anyway.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

4 months ago

I remember a practice question where we had to deal with resource allocation, and I think we ended up choosing a similar option to A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

5 months ago

I think option A makes the most sense, but I'm not entirely sure how to approach getting that formal agreement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

5 months ago

I think securing that formal agreement is key. We need to know exactly what resources we have to work with so we can plan accordingly. Trying to work around inconsistent team members or extended Timeboxes just feels risky to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnta

5 months ago

Making the Timeboxes longer to accommodate the limited hours seems like it could work, but I'm worried that might slow down the overall pace of the project. I'd want to be careful not to let the work expand to fill the available time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenora

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about accepting inconsistent team members. That could really throw off the project timeline and deliverables. Maybe we could look at scheduling the assistants at different times to try to get more consistent coverage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lili

5 months ago

This seems like a tricky situation with limited resources. I'd probably try to secure a formal agreement on the hours the marketing assistants can commit to the project. That way we have a clear understanding of what support we can expect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shad

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. Logistic regression doesn't handle correlated variables very well, so that's probably the true limitation they're looking for. I'll go with option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanda

1 year ago

Option C reminds me of that saying, 'Stretching a rubber band too far will only lead to it breaking.'

upvoted 0 times

...

Melina

1 year ago

Haha, Option B is like saying 'Let's just wing it and see what happens!' Not a very reliable strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

1 year ago

Option D sounds like a good idea too. Scheduling the marketing assistants at different times could help keep things organized.

upvoted 0 times

Milly

1 year ago

User 3: Scheduling the assistants at different times could also help with organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecily

1 year ago

User 2: That sounds like a good idea. It will help with consistency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Natalie

1 year ago

User 1: I think we should try to secure formal agreement on how many hours the marketing assistants will spend on the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruthann

1 year ago

I agree with Devora. A formal agreement is crucial to managing the limited resources effectively.

upvoted 0 times

Ronny

1 year ago

C) Make each Timebox as long as possible to ensure the marketing assistants have enough time to complete any work allocated to them within the boundaries of the Timebox.

upvoted 0 times

...