APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam - Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam

Question #: 19
Topic #: 2

[All AgilePM-Practitioner Questions]

Which 2 statements explain why the Contract Architect would be an appropriate Technical Co-ordinator?

AIs an external consultant.

BHas good leadership skills.

CHas experience of working with the company previously.

DHas a good, technical understanding of the work of the other professionals engaged in the project.

EIs an authority on local planning applications.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D

The two statements that explain why the Contract Architect would be an appropriate Technical Coordinator are:

B . Has good leadership skills. D. Has a good, technical understanding of the work of the other professionals engaged in the project.

Rationale:

* B: Good leadership skills are essential for a Technical Coordinator, as they must lead the technical aspects of the project, manage the work of other professionals, and ensure that all technical activities are aligned with the project goals.

* D: A deep technical understanding of the work of other professionals involved in the project is crucial for a Technical Coordinator. This knowledge allows them to effectively coordinate various technical disciplines and ensure that the technical solutions meet the project's needs.

Being an external consultant (A) or an authority on local planning applications (E) might be beneficial but do not inherently qualify someone for the role of Technical Coordinator. Previous experience with the company (C) can be helpful but is not a defining reason for suitability in the Technical Coordinator role within an Agile team.

by Dortha at Nov 18, 2024, 03:20 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AgilePM-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Scot

3 months ago

D is a must-have, can't agree more!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherron

3 months ago

Wait, is E really a big deal for a Technical Co-ordinator?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorenza

3 months ago

A seems off, being external might not help coordination.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

4 months ago

I think C is important too, knowing the company helps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

4 months ago

Definitely B and D! Leadership and technical skills are key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalyn

4 months ago

D seems really strong since technical understanding is crucial for coordination, but I’m torn about the other choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariann

4 months ago

I feel like being an external consultant (A) could be a disadvantage, but I can't recall why exactly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chara

4 months ago

I remember a practice question where experience with the company was highlighted as important, so I might lean towards C and D here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erin

5 months ago

I think option B about leadership skills makes sense, but I'm not sure if that's enough on its own.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

5 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'll need to really analyze each statement to determine the two most appropriate reasons for the Contract Architect to be the Technical Co-ordinator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassandra

5 months ago

The leadership skills and previous experience with the company are also important factors to consider here. I'll make sure to select those two options as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The Contract Architect's external consultant status and technical understanding of the other professionals' work would make them well-suited for the Technical Co-ordinator role.

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to carefully read through the options and think about which two would best justify the Contract Architect as the Technical Co-ordinator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Howard

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on identifying the two key statements that explain why the Contract Architect would be an appropriate Technical Co-ordinator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

1 year ago

D and B, no doubt. Although I'm curious to know if the Contract Architect has a superhuman ability to be in multiple places at once. That would certainly help with the coordination!

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

1 year ago

Haha, the Contract Architect as the Technical Co-ordinator? Sounds like a recipe for disaster - they'd probably just try to redesign the whole project from scratch!

upvoted 0 times

Portia

1 year ago

D) Has a good, technical understanding of the work of the other professionals engaged in the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benedict

1 year ago

A) Is an external consultant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leila

1 year ago

I also think statement C could be important if the Contract Architect has previous experience with the company.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pok

1 year ago

I agree, D and B are the way to go. Although E could be useful for navigating the local planning process, that's not the primary role of the Technical Co-ordinator.

upvoted 0 times

Selma

1 year ago

I agree, D and B are the way to go. Although E could be useful for navigating the local planning process, that's not the primary role of the Technical Co-ordinator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Odelia

1 year ago

B) Has good leadership skills.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

1 year ago

D) Has a good, technical understanding of the work of the other professionals engaged in the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

1 year ago

I agree with you, having good leadership skills and technical understanding is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Svetlana

1 year ago

D and B seem like the clear choices here. The Technical Co-ordinator needs to have a strong technical grasp of the project, and good leadership skills to coordinate the different professionals. A and C are nice-to-have, but not essential.

upvoted 0 times