Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam - Topic 2 Question 10 Discussion

Answer the following questions about the tracking and control activities carried out within the project.Decide whether each activity has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.During Foundations, the key stakeholders had very different views about the content and prioritisation for the high-level requirements. As a result, the Project Managerorganized a Facilitated Workshop with the project team to discuss and agree the requirements.Is this an appropriate application of Agile Project Management for this project?
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
B) Yes, because this will allow each team member working in a Timebox to raise any issues which may hinder their progress.
C) No, because early and frequent delivery of the product features will on its own be sufficient to maintain engagement with the stakeholders.
D) No, because a Review Session should have been scheduled to enable the Solution Development Team to validate their understanding of the stakeholders' expectations.

APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam - Topic 2 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 2
[All AgilePM-Practitioner Questions]

Answer the following questions about the tracking and control activities carried out within the project.

Decide whether each activity has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.

During Foundations, the key stakeholders had very different views about the content and prioritisation for the high-level requirements. As a result, the Project Manager

organized a Facilitated Workshop with the project team to discuss and agree the requirements.

Is this an appropriate application of Agile Project Management for this project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Jonell at Aug 02, 2024, 04:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AgilePM-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shalon
6 months ago
B sounds right, timeboxes are great for addressing issues as they come up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
6 months ago
I think D makes a good point, a Review Session would help clarify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
7 months ago
Not so sure about A, seems like just talking won't fix everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
7 months ago
I agree with A too, getting everyone on the same page is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
7 months ago
Definitely A! Communication is key in Agile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
7 months ago
I have a feeling that option C is not correct because just delivering features isn't enough; we need to involve stakeholders actively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
7 months ago
I think option B is relevant too, but it seems more focused on team progress rather than stakeholder alignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option D could be valid since a Review Session might help clarify expectations better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
8 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder engagement in Agile, so I think option A makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
8 months ago
The Facilitated Workshop sounds like a reasonable approach to me. It allows the team to raise any issues that could hinder their progress, which is key in an Agile environment. I think I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
8 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions "very different views" among stakeholders, so I'm not sure if the Facilitated Workshop is the best approach. Maybe a Review Session would have been more appropriate to validate the team's understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about applying Agile project management principles. I think the key is to focus on the communication and collaboration aspects, which the Facilitated Workshop seems to address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option A. Bringing the stakeholders together to discuss and agree on the requirements seems like a good way to promote communication and buy-in, which is important in Agile projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward corporate governance question. I'll carefully review the options and think through the typical process for appointing a company director.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember we had a practice question about write-offs being used in accounting fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and options to make sure I understand the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
2 years ago
Yes, I see your point. Involving stakeholders early on can help prevent misunderstandings and ensure alignment with project goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
2 years ago
I agree with option A. It's important to involve stakeholders in requirement discussions for better communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
2 years ago
B) Yes, because this will allow each team member working in a Timebox to raise any issues which may hinder their progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
2 years ago
Haha, early and frequent delivery won't do much if the team doesn't even understand the requirements! C is definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Alida
2 years ago
Haha, early and frequent delivery won't do much if the team doesn't even understand the requirements! C is definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
2 years ago
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elliott
2 years ago
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 years ago
I'm not sure a Timebox is the right approach for this project since the stakeholders have such different views. Option B doesn't seem relevant.
upvoted 0 times
Esteban
2 years ago
D) No, because a Review Session should have been scheduled to enable the Solution Development Team to validate their understanding of the stakeholders' expectations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
2 years ago
C) No, because early and frequent delivery of the product features will on its own be sufficient to maintain engagement with the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 years ago
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evelynn
2 years ago
A facilitated workshop is a great way to align the team on requirements. Discussing them upfront with stakeholders promotes buy-in, so I think option A is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Sherrell
2 years ago
A facilitated workshop is a great way to align the team on requirements. Discussing them upfront with stakeholders promotes buy-in, so I think option A is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 years ago
B) Yes, because this will allow each team member working in a Timebox to raise any issues which may hinder their progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 years ago
A) Yes, because discussing requirements in the presence of project stakeholders will promote communication and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel