Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 29 Discussion

Answer the following questions about the acceptance criteria within the project.Decide whether the approach to setting and using acceptance criteria has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.During Solution Development Timebox A, a new Health and Safety requirement arises: the front door is required to have wheelchair access. This is a legal requirement and is a Must Have before any staff or general public access can be allowed. The Solution Development Team will work with the Local Planning Authority Officer, the specialist who identified the requirement, to identify further acceptance criteria for Solution Development Timebox A.Is this an appropriate action related to acceptance criteria?
A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
C) No, because this new requirement would NOT be included in the original Prioritised Requirements List and therefore does NOT need acceptance criteria to be defined.
D) No, because the Business Visionary is responsible for defining acceptance criteria.

APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's AgilePM-Practitioner exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 1
[All AgilePM-Practitioner Questions]

Answer the following questions about the acceptance criteria within the project.

Decide whether the approach to setting and using acceptance criteria has been applied appropriately and select the response that supports your decision.

During Solution Development Timebox A, a new Health and Safety requirement arises: the front door is required to have wheelchair access. This is a legal requirement and is a Must Have before any staff or general public access can be allowed. The Solution Development Team will work with the Local Planning Authority Officer, the specialist who identified the requirement, to identify further acceptance criteria for Solution Development Timebox A.

Is this an appropriate action related to acceptance criteria?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A . Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.

Rationale:

Agile Project Management is adaptable to changes, even late in the development process. The introduction of a new Health and Safety requirement, such as wheelchair access, which is a legal and must-have requirement, needs to be incorporated into the project as soon as it is identified. Working with the Local Planning Authority Officer to define acceptance criteria ensures that the requirement is clearly understood and that the solution developed meets the necessary legal standards. This approach ensures that the team can immediately address the new requirement and integrate it into the current work cycle, aligning with Agile's principle of welcoming changing requirements, even late in development, for the customer's competitive advantage.


by Rex at Jul 08, 2025, 06:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AgilePM-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Una
8 months ago
Agree, the Local Planning Authority should be involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
9 months ago
Wait, how can they change criteria mid-project?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
9 months ago
But wasn't this requirement already in the initial scope?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
9 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
9 months ago
Definitely a must-have for safety!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
10 months ago
I’m not convinced about option B. Just because the Local Planning Authority Officer identified it doesn’t mean they own the acceptance criteria, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
10 months ago
I feel like this situation is similar to a practice question we did where we had to adapt to new requirements mid-project. I think A is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
10 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this. I remember something about prioritization, but if it's a legal requirement, shouldn't it be included regardless?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
10 months ago
I think option A makes sense since the requirement is a legal must-have, so it definitely needs to be addressed in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. The question is asking if the approach to the acceptance criteria is appropriate, but there are a few different options. I'll need to re-read the details and think through the implications of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The new requirement is a legal must-have, so it needs to be addressed in this timebox. Working with the specialist to define the acceptance criteria is the appropriate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. The new requirement seems important, but I'm not sure if it should be handled within the current timebox or if it needs to be added to the original requirements list. I'll have to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about acceptance criteria. I'll need to carefully read through the details to understand the context and make the right decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to have clear criteria for all project requirements to ensure successful delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 year ago
I think the new requirement should have acceptance criteria defined to ensure it is properly implemented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
1 year ago
C) No, because this new requirement would NOT be included in the original Prioritised Requirements List and therefore does NOT need acceptance criteria to be defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 year ago
Haha, imagine if the Business Visionary tried to define acceptance criteria for a legal wheelchair access requirement. That would be a real 'must not' situation!
upvoted 0 times
Novella
11 months ago
Haha, imagine if the Business Visionary tried to define acceptance criteria for a legal wheelchair access requirement. That would be a real 'must not' situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
William
11 months ago
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
1 year ago
A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Earnestine
1 year ago
B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
Option B makes the most sense to me. The Local Planning Authority Officer is the expert, so they should be the one guiding the acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
Carlene
1 year ago
I agree, the specialist who identified the requirement should definitely be involved in setting the acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
Option B makes the most sense to me. The Local Planning Authority Officer is the expert, so they should be the one guiding the acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theodora
1 year ago
A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
1 year ago
I'm with Charisse on this one. We can't just ignore a legal requirement, even if it wasn't on the original list. Gotta stay agile, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, staying agile means adapting to new requirements as they arise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
1 year ago
User 2: I agree with Victor. We have to address the legal requirement in a timely manner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
User 1: A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charisse
1 year ago
Option A seems like the way to go. The new requirement is a legal must-have, so it needs to be addressed in this timebox.
upvoted 0 times
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
User 3: User Comment: Option A seems like the way to go. The new requirement is a legal must-have, so it needs to be addressed in this timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
1 year ago
User 2: B) Yes, because the Local Planning Authority Officer owns the justification for the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
User 1: A) Yes, because the new requirement needs to be understood, built and delivered in this Timebox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel