Free APMG-International AgilePM-Practitioner Exam Dumps

The two actions that the Workshop Facilitator should take if the team cannot agree on the system content are:

C . Facilitate the creation of a list of actions to be carried out after the workshop, to resolve the issue.This will ensure that the disagreement does not stall the project and that there is a clear plan for how to move forward.

E . Prepare a report describing the outcome of the workshop.This will provide a record of the discussion and any decisions made, which can be useful for future reference and for keeping stakeholders informed.

Please note that while presenting their own interpretation of what the system should include (option A) or presenting the group with a predefined specification of what should be included (option B) might seem like potential solutions, these actions could bias the discussion and may not lead to a solution that meets all stakeholders' needs. Agreeing to disagree and closing the workshop (option D) could leave the issue unresolved, which could cause problems later in the project. The facilitator's role is to guide the discussion and help the team reach a consensus, not to impose their own views or prematurely end the discussion.

C . No, because by the end of Foundations the quality expectations and overall acceptance criteria for at least the first increment should have been set, and high-level acceptance criteria set for later increments.

Rationale:

In Agile Project Management, it's important to establish high-level acceptance criteria early in the project to guide development and ensure that the solution meets the business needs and quality expectations. The Foundations phase is when the project's scope, objectives, and methods are defined, including the acceptance criteria for the first increment and at a high level for subsequent increments. This ensures that everyone has a clear understanding of what 'done' looks like before development begins, reducing the risk of misalignment and rework.