Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam SOA-C02 Topic 3 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SOA-C02 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 3
[All SOA-C02 Questions]

A company's SysOps administrator maintains a highly available environment. The environment includes Amazon EC2 instances and an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ database. The EC2 instances are in an Auto Scaling group behind an Application Load Balancer.

Recently, the company conducted a failover test. The SysOps administrator needs to decrease the failover time of the RDS database by at least 10%.

Which solution will meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/improving-application-availability-with-amazon-rds-proxy/


by Florencia at May 29, 2024, 12:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SOA-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rikki
4 days ago
Creating a read replica in another AWS Region and promoting it in case of failure (option C) could also work, but that might be overkill for just a 10% improvement in failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
14 days ago
Vital signs are definitely objective data collected right at the start of patient assessment. I'm pretty confident about choosing D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
16 days ago
This seems straightforward. I'll focus on the instructions and think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
18 days ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm thinking IT Financial Management is the least likely for Problem Management to interface with on a regular basis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
18 days ago
Okay, let's see here. Using synchronous jobs and disabling multi-threading don't sound like the right approaches to me. I'm leaning towards the asynchronous jobs and timeout options, but I'll need to double-check the details on those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 years ago
What is this, a trick question? The answer is clearly A. Bigger is always better, right? Forget all this multi-AZ and proxy nonsense, just crank up that RDS instance and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 years ago
D, the RDS proxy, now that's a clever solution. Redirecting the app through the proxy endpoint could make the failover process much smoother. I like it!
upvoted 0 times
Jordan
1 years ago
Redirecting the app through the proxy endpoint could make the failover process much smoother. I like it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 years ago
D, the RDS proxy, now that's a clever solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonardo
1 years ago
C is an interesting option, creating a read replica in another region and promoting it in case of failure. That could definitely reduce failover time, but it might be overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Jeniffer
1 years ago
A: True, we should consider all options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
1 years ago
B: Yeah, but it might be a bit overkill for this scenario. Maybe there's a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
1 years ago
A: I think C is a good option, creating a read replica in another region could really help with reducing failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
1 years ago
A: That could work. It might help decrease the failover time without adding too much complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 years ago
B: Yeah, I agree. Maybe increasing the RDS instance size would be a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
1 years ago
A: I think option C is a bit too much for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mirta
1 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D with RDS proxy would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
1 years ago
Hmm, increasing the RDS instance size seems like the obvious choice, but I'm not sure if that's really the best way to decrease failover time. Modifying the cluster to a single AZ could be faster, but that might compromise availability.
upvoted 0 times
Vi
1 years ago
B: Yeah, promoting the read replica in case of failure could definitely decrease the failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
1 years ago
A: I think creating a read replica in another AWS Region could be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
1 years ago
A: Yeah, it's a good way to ensure high availability while also improving failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
1 years ago
B: Yeah, promoting the read replica in case of failure could definitely help decrease failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 years ago
B: I agree, promoting the read replica in case of failure could definitely decrease the failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
1 years ago
A: I think creating a read replica in another AWS Region could be a good solution. It would help with failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
1 years ago
A: I think creating a read replica in another AWS Region could be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
1 years ago
I think option C could work well for decreasing failover time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel