A company is migrating its infrastructure to the AWS Cloud. The company must comply with a variety of regulatory standards for different projects. The company needs a multi-account environment.
A solutions architect needs to prepare the baseline infrastructure. The solution must provide a consistent baseline of management and security, but it must allow flexibility for different compliance requirements within various AWS accounts. The solution also needs to integrate with the existing on-premises Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) server.
Which solution meets these requirements with the LEAST amount of operational overhead?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium SAP-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
YU
Yuki Pham
13 days ago
I would pick C because an OU structure with central logging and conformance packs gives governance while keeping per-account flexibility.
MU
Muriel
15 days ago
C's central logging is a plus, but B feels more streamlined.
DI
Dick
21 days ago
A has a clear logging process, which is crucial.
CA
Carli
26 days ago
I like B for its straightforward integration with AD FS.
JA
Jacquelyne
1 month ago
D looks good, but I prefer the guardrails in B.
JE
Jettie
1 month ago
I feel like C offers a good balance of control and flexibility.
RO
Rosendo
1 month ago
Option A seems solid too, but more manual work.
LI
Lisha
2 months ago
I agree, less overhead with AWS Control Tower.
NE
Nelida
2 months ago
I think option B is the best. Control Tower simplifies management.
FI
Filiberto
2 months ago
D might be too complex for some teams.
FE
Felix
2 months ago
I feel like C covers all bases without too much hassle.
HA
Halina
2 months ago
A's central logging is crucial for audits.
GI
Gilbert
2 months ago
B's guardrails are a big plus for compliance.
ST
Stephane
3 months ago
D is appealing too, but I worry about the overhead.
JU
Justine
3 months ago
C has a good balance of security and flexibility.
OR
Orville
3 months ago
I agree, but A seems more straightforward for logging.
MA
Maxima
3 months ago
I think option B is the best. Control Tower simplifies management.
CL
Clay
3 months ago
Wait, can AWS Control Tower really handle all those compliance needs?
VI
Vince
3 months ago
I agree, B has the right mix of flexibility and control.
CH
Chantell
4 months ago
Not sure about D, seems like it might miss some compliance checks.
AU
Audry
4 months ago
I think A is better for centralized logging!
KE
Kerry
4 months ago
Option B seems solid with Control Tower for governance.
ON
Onita
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because it mentions a central logging account, which seems important for compliance, but I’m not entirely sure about the SCP setup.
ER
Eric
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question about IAM identity providers, and I feel like options B and D could be close, but I can't recall the specifics on the logging requirements.
MY
My
6 months ago
I think enabling AWS Control Tower might be the way to go since it provides built-in guardrails, but I need to double-check how it integrates with AD FS.
BE
Beata
6 months ago
I remember studying about AWS Organizations and how it helps manage multiple accounts, but I'm not sure which option minimizes operational overhead the best.