New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon SAP-C02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 1
[All SAP-C02 Questions]

A company needs to modernize a legacy .NET Framework application. The application uses an application server and a Microsoft SQL Server database.

The company also needs to perform the following tasks:

Containerize the application into microservices.

* Keep control of the operating system patches and storage for the application layer.

* Add load balancing for the web servers.

* Make the application highly available.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jettie
3 months ago
Multi-AZ for RDS is a must for high availability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
3 months ago
I disagree, EKS is overkill for this app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
3 months ago
Surprised no one mentioned the cost differences!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
I think D is better since it keeps SQL Server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
4 months ago
Option A looks solid with ECS and RDS for SQL Server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
4 months ago
I feel like using the Porting Assistant for .NET is a good choice, but I can't remember if EKS with Fargate is the best option for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between Network Load Balancer and Application Load Balancer. I hope I can recall the right one during the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
4 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar because it mentions using Amazon RDS for SQL Server, which we practiced in a similar question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using an Application Load Balancer for web traffic, but I'm not sure if it applies to all scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
5 months ago
This question covers a lot of ground, but I think I can piece together a solid solution by considering the key requirements and matching them to the appropriate AWS services. Time to put my AWS knowledge to the test!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the differences between Application Load Balancer and Network Load Balancer. I'll need to review those details to make the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. We need to modernize the app, keep control of the OS and storage, add load balancing, and ensure high availability. Sounds like a good opportunity to leverage AWS services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
Hmm, containerizing a legacy .NET app and deploying it on AWS services - that's a lot to consider. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward cloud migration question. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 year ago
That's true, option A seems to be the most suitable for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 year ago
I'm just glad I don't have to deal with all this cloud complexity. I'll stick to my trusty on-premises server and a Excel spreadsheet!
upvoted 0 times
Brigette
11 months ago
D: Agreed, it seems like a good solution for modernizing the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
11 months ago
C: I think option A might be the best fit for the company's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
11 months ago
B: Yeah, it can definitely be a lot to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
12 months ago
A: I hear you, dealing with cloud services can be overwhelming.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
But option A specifically mentions using Amazon RDS for SQL Server, which is what we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
I'm not sure, option C also looks like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 year ago
I agree with Kayleigh, option A seems to meet all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
1 year ago
This is a tough one, but I think option A is the safest bet. Amazon ECS, EC2 instances, and RDS for SQL Server - it's a tried and true approach.
upvoted 0 times
Marquetta
12 months ago
Yeah, I think sticking with the familiar technologies like ECS and RDS is the way to go for this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
I agree, option A seems like the most reliable choice. Amazon ECS and RDS for SQL Server are solid services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
1 year ago
As a developer, I'd prefer option D. The Porting Assistant for .NET and the Application Load Balancer in front of the Auto Scaling group appeal to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option B. ECS with a Network Load Balancer and Aurora MySQL sounds like a nice balance of control and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
1 year ago
Wow, this is a complex question! I think option C is the way to go. Containerizing the app with EKS and Fargate, along with Aurora MySQL and cross-Region replicas, seems like a robust and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Hillary
1 year ago
I agree, using Aurora MySQL and cross-Region replicas adds to the robustness of the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
Option C sounds like a solid choice. EKS and Fargate offer great scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
1 year ago
Definitely, containerizing with EKS and Fargate seems like the best way to modernize the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 year ago
I agree, using Aurora MySQL and cross-Region replicas adds to the robustness of the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
1 year ago
Option C sounds like a solid choice. EKS and Fargate offer great scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel