Amazon Exam MLS-C01 Topic 3 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLS-C01 exam

Question #: 82
Topic #: 3

A Machine Learning Specialist is working for an online retailer that wants to run analytics on every customer visit, processed through a machine learning pipeline. The data needs to be ingested by Amazon Kinesis Data Streams at up to 100 transactions per second, and the JSON data blob is 100 KB in size.

What is the MINIMUM number of shards in Kinesis Data Streams the Specialist should use to successfully ingest this data?

A1 shards

B10 shards

C100 shards

D1,000 shards

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D, F

by Quentin at Nov 26, 2023, 11:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MLS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Whitney

2 months ago

Wait, are we talking about shards or Sauron's Nazgûl? Because I'm pretty sure 100 shards could take down a whole army of orcs...

upvoted 0 times

...

Anabel

2 months ago

1 shard? Seriously? That's like trying to drink from a fire hose. This is a job for an army of shards!

upvoted 0 times

Malcom

17 days ago

Let's go with 15 shards to be safe and ensure we can handle the data smoothly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ling

19 days ago

Maybe even more than 10 shards, we need to make sure we can handle the data without any bottlenecks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

20 days ago

I agree, we need to distribute the workload across multiple shards to handle the incoming data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Giuseppe

22 days ago

I think we should use at least 10 shards to handle this amount of data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrina

2 months ago

I'm going with 1,000 shards. Can't be too careful when it comes to high-volume data ingestion. Gotta future-proof that pipeline, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Eveline

2 months ago

Nah, 10 shards won't cut it. With that kind of throughput, we're looking at at least 100 shards to handle the load. Better safe than sorry!

upvoted 0 times

Kanisha

1 months ago

Definitely, we need to make sure the system can handle the throughput.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

1 months ago

Agreed, better safe than sorry when it comes to ingesting data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edelmira

2 months ago

Yeah, 10 shards definitely won't be enough for this kind of throughput.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

2 months ago

Agreed, better safe than sorry when it comes to ingesting data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristina

2 months ago

I think we should go with 100 shards to handle the load.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lazaro

2 months ago

I think we should go with 100 shards to handle the load.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

3 months ago

I think the answer is 10 shards. 100 KB data blobs at 100 transactions per second should be well within the capacity of 10 shards.

upvoted 0 times

Santos

2 months ago

Using 10 shards seems like the most efficient option for ingesting the data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

2 months ago

I think 10 shards is the correct choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Toi

2 months ago

I agree, 10 shards should be enough to handle that data load.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aaron

3 months ago

I disagree, I think the Specialist should use 100 shards to ensure smooth data ingestion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blythe

4 months ago

I agree with Golda, 10 shards should be enough to handle the data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

4 months ago

I think the Specialist should use 10 shards.

upvoted 0 times

...