An ML engineer is using Amazon SageMaker Canvas to build a custom ML model from an imported dataset. The model must make continuous numeric predictions based on 10 years of data.
Which metric should the ML engineer use to evaluate the model's performance?
This is a regression problem, where the target variable is continuous and numeric. AWS documentation clearly states that classification metrics such as accuracy and AUC are not appropriate for regression models.
Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) measures the square root of the average squared differences between predicted and actual values. RMSE penalizes larger errors more heavily, making it especially useful when large prediction errors are costly or undesirable.
SageMaker Canvas automatically selects regression metrics such as RMSE and MAE when building regression models. RMSE is widely used for time-based and numeric prediction problems, especially when evaluating long historical datasets.
Inference latency measures system performance, not model accuracy.
Therefore, Option D is the correct and AWS-verified answer.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!