Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon MLA-C01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLA-C01 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 2
[All MLA-C01 Questions]

A company has used Amazon SageMaker to deploy a predictive ML model in production. The company is using SageMaker Model Monitor on the model. After a model update, an ML engineer notices data quality issues in the Model Monitor checks.

What should the ML engineer do to mitigate the data quality issues that Model Monitor has identified?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jill at Nov 23, 2025, 05:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MLA-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gerri
4 days ago
D seems risky. More data doesn’t always mean better results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
10 days ago
I feel like adjusting parameters won't solve the root issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
15 days ago
Option B could work too, but it’s not as effective as C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
20 days ago
Agreed! A new baseline helps with current data quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
25 days ago
A and B are not the best choices here, just saying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
1 month ago
D could work too, but it might take longer to retrain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
1 month ago
Wait, can you really just change the baseline like that? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
2 months ago
Totally agree with C, gotta update the baseline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. New baseline needed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
2 months ago
C) is the way to go, no doubt. Gotta keep that model monitoring on point, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
2 months ago
Haha, A) is like trying to fix a flat tire by adjusting the car's suspension. Nice try, but not the right solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with B. Manually running the model monitor job could give you more insights into the data issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
3 months ago
D) sounds like a lot of work. Why not just go with C and save some time?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
3 months ago
I agree, C is the way to go. Gotta keep that data quality on point!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
3 months ago
C) is the correct answer. Updating the baseline with the latest dataset is the best way to address the data quality issues identified by Model Monitor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where updating the baseline was key. It makes sense to create a new baseline with the latest data for accurate evaluations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Updating the baseline and the Model Monitor checks seems like the most prudent way to get a handle on the data quality problems before making any major changes to the model itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
4 months ago
Adding more data to the existing training set and retraining the model could work, but I'd want to be really careful about that. We don't want to just throw more data at the problem without addressing the underlying data quality issues first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
4 months ago
I think creating a new baseline from the latest dataset and updating the Model Monitor to use that new baseline is probably the safest approach here. That way, we can make sure the monitoring is based on the most up-to-date information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
4 months ago
I feel like initiating a manual Model Monitor job could help, but it seems more like a temporary fix rather than addressing the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
4 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. New baseline is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
4 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of creating a new baseline when data quality issues arise. That might be the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think just adjusting parameters won't really solve the underlying data issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
Okay, so it sounds like we need to investigate the data quality issues more closely. Initiating a manual Model Monitor job with the latest production data seems like a good first step to get a better understanding of what's going on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
5 months ago
I'm not sure if I should adjust the model parameters or hyperparameters right away. That seems like it could be a bit risky without understanding the root cause of the data quality issues first.
upvoted 0 times
Tu
5 months ago
I agree, tweaking parameters might not be the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel