MENU
A developer is designing a serverless application with two AWS Lambda functions to process photos. One Lambda function stores objects in an Amazon S3 bucket and stores the associated metadata in an Amazon DynamoDB table. The other Lambda function fetches the objects from the S3 bucket by using the metadata from the DynamoDB table. Both Lambda functions use the same Python library to perform complex computations and are approaching the quota for the maximum size of zipped deployment packages.
What should the developer do to reduce the size of the Lambda deployment packages with the LEAST operational overhead?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium DVA-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
LA
Lacey
11 months ago
Option D sounds like a workaround, not a solution.
KA
Kaycee
12 months ago
Packaging libraries separately (Option A) just adds more hassle.
AL
Alyce
12 months ago
Surprised that people still don't use Lambda layers! It's a game changer.
GE
Gerald
1 year ago
I disagree, combining functions (Option C) could simplify things.
LO
Lonna
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go! Lambda layers are super handy.
AR
Arlyne
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the S3 option. Downloading the library to S3 seems like it could add more complexity. Wouldn't that be more operational overhead?
CA
Catalina
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think using a Lambda layer is the best approach. It keeps things organized and efficient.
SH
Shad
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like combining the functions into one might complicate things. Option C could lead to more issues later on.
HA
Harrison
1 year ago
I remember discussing Lambda layers in class, and I think option B makes the most sense for reducing package size with minimal overhead.
LU
Lucina
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Does the GDPR have specific provisions for handling data of deceased individuals? I'll need to review the regulation more closely to determine the appropriate course of action here.
LA
Latonia
1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question, just need to follow the TOGAF process. I'd start by identifying the gaps and solutions, then group them into work packages based on dependencies. Gotta make sure to account for the geographic rollout and clinical trial schedules too.
JO
Jonelle
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. CAN, BASIC, and FPGA don't seem directly related to the industrial control systems described in the question. I think I'll go with SCADA, but I'm not 100% certain.