Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

A company is developing an application in which IoT devices will report measurements to the AWS Cloud. The application will have millions of end users. The company observes that the IoT devices cannot support DNS resolution. The company needs to implement an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling solution so that the IoT devices can connect to an application endpoint without using DNS.Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
D) Use an AWS Global Accelerator accelerator with a Network Load Balancer (NLB) endpoint. Create an EC2 Auto Scaling group. Attach the Auto Scaling group to the NLB. Set up the IoT devices to connect to the IP addresses of the accelerator.
A) Use an Application Load Balancer (ALB)-type target group for a Network Load Balancer (NLB). Create an EC2 Auto Scaling group. Attach the Auto Scaling group to the ALB. Set up the IoT devices to connect to the IP addresses of the NLB.
B) Use an AWS Global Accelerator accelerator with an Application Load Balancer (ALB) endpoint. Create an EC2 Auto Scaling group. Attach the Auto Scaling group to the ALSet up the IoT devices to connect to the IP addresses of the accelerator.
C) Use a Network Load Balancer (NLB). Create an EC2 Auto Scaling group. Attach the Auto Scaling group to the NLB. Set up the IoT devices to connect to the IP addresses of the NLB.

Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 5
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company is developing an application in which IoT devices will report measurements to the AWS Cloud. The application will have millions of end users. The company observes that the IoT devices cannot support DNS resolution. The company needs to implement an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling solution so that the IoT devices can connect to an application endpoint without using DNS.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

AWS Global Accelerator can provide static IP addresses that the IoT devices can connect to without using DNS2.It can also route traffic over the AWS global network and improve performance and availability for the IoT devices2.An NLB can provide end-to-end encryption for HTTPS traffic by using TLS as a target group protocol and terminating SSL connections at the load balancer level1.An NLB can also support session affinity (sticky sessions) with TCP connections1.


by Jesusita at Sep 18, 2024, 10:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Destiny
6 months ago
I think D could be more reliable with the accelerator, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
6 months ago
I'm surprised they can't use DNS at all. That's a big limitation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
7 months ago
Wait, why not use Global Accelerator? Seems like a missed opportunity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
7 months ago
I agree, C is definitely the simplest solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
7 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward with just an NLB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
7 months ago
I recall that using an Auto Scaling group with NLB is a common pattern for IoT applications. I think option C might be the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the Global Accelerator. Does it really add value if the IoT devices can't resolve DNS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
8 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to choose between ALB and NLB. I feel like NLB is the right choice since it handles IP addresses directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
8 months ago
I remember something about using NLBs for high performance, but I'm not sure if it's the most cost-effective option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
8 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think I've got a handle on it. I'm leaning towards option D - the AWS Global Accelerator with the NLB endpoint. That should provide the scalability and IP-based connectivity the IoT devices need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
8 months ago
Okay, I'm a bit confused by the differences between the Network Load Balancer and the Application Load Balancer. I'll need to review the details of each to figure out which one is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
8 months ago
Hmm, the key here seems to be that the IoT devices can't use DNS resolution. I think options B and D that use the AWS Global Accelerator might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and the different options to determine the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
8 months ago
I've got a good feeling about option A. Using the NLB with the Auto Scaling group seems like a straightforward and cost-effective solution that meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Run lines are used to indicate the slope of a straight run, and the color is important for visualizing the slope. I believe the correct answer is B, black, but I'll review my notes to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
2 years ago
Alright, let's get serious here. Option C is the way to go - NLB and Auto Scaling group. Simple, effective, and cost-conscious. Nailed it!
upvoted 0 times
Pok
2 years ago
Great, let's go with option C then. Thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
2 years ago
It's definitely a cost-effective solution that meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 years ago
Yeah, using a Network Load Balancer with Auto Scaling group makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
2 years ago
I agree, option C seems like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pilar
2 years ago
Haha, maybe they should just tell the IoT devices to 'figure it out' and connect to the load balancer. No DNS? No problem!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
2 years ago
Hmm, I don't know. The Global Accelerator might add some extra performance benefits. But you're right, it's probably overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Vince
2 years ago
C: The Global Accelerator might be overkill for this scenario. Let's go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
2 years ago
B: Yeah, using an ALB-type target group for a NLB sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
2 years ago
A: I think option A might be the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
2 years ago
C: I agree, setting up the IoT devices to connect to the IP addresses of the NLB should work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
2 years ago
B: Yeah, using an ALB-type target group for a NLB seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 years ago
A: I think option A might be the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ramonita
2 years ago
That's a good point, the Global Accelerator could provide better performance for the IoT devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better because of the AWS Global Accelerator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 years ago
I'm with Lenora on this one. Option C seems like the way to go - keep it simple with the Network Load Balancer and Auto Scaling group.
upvoted 0 times
Art
2 years ago
True, but it might also be more expensive. Option C could be the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 years ago
But what about option D with the Global Accelerator? It might offer better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
2 years ago
I agree with you, option C does seem like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ramonita
2 years ago
I think option A is the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
2 years ago
Option C looks like the most straightforward and cost-effective solution here. No need for the extra complexity of the Global Accelerator.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
2 years ago
Yeah, option C is simple and cost-effective. No need for the extra features of the Global Accelerator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 years ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel