New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon ANS-C01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 1
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company is running business applications on AWS. The company uses 50 AWS accounts, thousands of VPCs. and 3 AWS Regions across the United States and Europe.

A network engineer needs to establish network connectivity between an on-premises data center and the Regions. The network engineer also must establish connectivity between the VPCs. On-premises users and applications must be able to connect to applications that run in the VPCs.

The company has an existing AWS Direct Connect connection that the network engineer can use. The network engineer creates a transit gateway in each Region and configures the transit gateways as inter-Region peers.

Which solution will provide network connectivity from the on-premises data center to the Regions and will provide inter-VPC communications across the different Regions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Eun
3 months ago
B seems too complicated for what they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
3 months ago
Definitely not A, that won't work for inter-Region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
3 months ago
Wait, can a transit VIF really handle that? Seems sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
4 months ago
I think option C is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
4 months ago
Sounds like a transit gateway setup is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
4 months ago
I recall that using a Direct Connect gateway is important for inter-region connectivity, so option B might not be the best fit since it mentions a virtual private gateway instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between a private VIF and a transit VIF. I feel like I might have mixed them up in my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
4 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar from practice questions, where we used transit VIFs to connect multiple VPCs. That might be the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
5 months ago
I remember studying about Direct Connect and how it can be used with transit gateways, but I'm not sure if a private VIF is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the mention of the existing AWS Direct Connect connection. Does that change how I should approach this, or can I just ignore that and focus on the new connectivity needs? I want to make sure I'm not missing any important details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to use the transit gateways to connect the VPCs across Regions, and then use a Direct Connect gateway to connect the on-premises data center. Option C looks like the best solution to meet all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the VIF types and how they would work in this scenario. I'll need to review the AWS Direct Connect documentation to make sure I understand the implications of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky question, but I think I have a good handle on the key concepts. I'll need to carefully consider the options and how they relate to the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
12 months ago
Well, if we're going for the most 'transit'-ional solution, I'd have to go with C. Get that Direct Connect gateway and transit VIF working together, you know? Smooth sailing from there on out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Creating a private VIF to a new Direct Connect gateway and associating it with the VPCs seems like a cleaner approach than the transit gateway option.
upvoted 0 times
Carlee
11 months ago
I agree, setting up a private VIF to a new Direct Connect gateway seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
11 months ago
I think B is the way to go. It's simpler and more direct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jannette
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option D because it seems like a more secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 year ago
D seems like the most straightforward solution. Using a public VIF for the Site-to-Site VPN connection and attaching it to the transit gateways should provide the connectivity we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the most suitable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
1 year ago
Option C looks promising, but I'm a bit concerned about the complexity of configuring the transit VIF and the Direct Connect gateway. Seems like a lot of moving parts.
upvoted 0 times
Christene
12 months ago
That's a good point. Option A could be a more straightforward solution to ensure network connectivity without too many moving parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
12 months ago
What about Option A? Creating a private VIF with a virtual private gateway seems straightforward and might be easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
12 months ago
Yeah, setting up the transit VIF and Direct Connect gateway might be a bit tricky. Maybe there's a simpler option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
12 months ago
Option C does seem like a good solution for the network connectivity, but I understand your concern about the complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
1 year ago
I think option A is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel