New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Alibaba ACP-Cloud1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACP-Cloud1 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 4
[All ACP-Cloud1 Questions]

A challenging thing in the gaming industry is the unpredictable and fluctuating business traffic. For example, 1 ECS instance is enough to meet all business demands today; however, we may need 10 ECS instances tomorrow.

In this situation, it is difficult to predict the number of ECS instances required. If we use too few ECS instances, we may not be able to cope with business peaks; whereas if we use too many ECS instances, we may introduce unnecessary costs.

On Alibaba Cloud, _______________ is the best product portfolio to cope with the gaming scenario described above.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In this scenario, a combination of Server Load Balancer (SLB), ECS, ApsaraDB for RDS, and Auto Scaling is ideal. SLB distributes incoming traffic across multiple ECS instances, ensuring high availability and reliability. Auto Scaling automatically adjusts the number of ECS instances based on demand, managing costs efficiently by scaling out during peak times and scaling in when demand decreases. ApsaraDB for RDS provides a managed database service that handles increasing database demands without requiring complex manual scaling. This portfolio is optimal for fluctuating gaming traffic as it ensures load balancing, scalability, and cost control.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ashton
2 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize the demand could change so fast!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
2 months ago
Totally agree, can't go wrong with that combo!
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
2 months ago
I think option A covers all bases with Auto Scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
3 months ago
Not sure if Auto Scaling is reliable enough for gaming traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
3 months ago
But do we really need ApsaraDB for RDS? Seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because it includes everything we might need, but I’m a bit unsure about the necessity of ApsaraDB for RDS in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
3 months ago
I feel like just using ECS might not be sufficient for gaming scenarios. We need something more robust, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 months ago
I think the combination of SLB and Auto Scaling is crucial for handling peaks effectively, similar to a practice question we did last week.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
4 months ago
I remember studying about how Auto Scaling can help manage fluctuating traffic, but I'm not sure if it’s enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
4 months ago
This is a great question that tests our understanding of cloud infrastructure and scalability. I'm confident that option A is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different Alibaba Cloud products mentioned. I'll need to review the details of each one to determine the best fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The answer is A - Server Load Balancer, ECS, RDS, and Auto Scaling. That combination should be able to dynamically adjust the resources as needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
4 months ago
Hmm, the key seems to be finding a solution that can automatically scale up and down to meet the fluctuating demand. I'll have to think through which product portfolio best handles that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the different options and how they address the unpredictable business traffic in the gaming industry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
7 months ago
Option C is the clear winner here. It's like a seesaw - you've got ECS on one end and Auto Scaling on the other, keeping your infrastructure perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
7 months ago
Definitely C. Who needs a crystal ball when you've got Auto Scaling? It's like having a genie in a bottle, granting your wishes for the perfect number of ECS instances, no matter how wild the demand gets.
upvoted 0 times
Eladia
5 months ago
A: No matter how wild the demand gets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
5 months ago
B: It's like having a genie in a bottle, granting your wishes for the perfect number of ECS instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
7 months ago
A: Definitely C. Who needs a crystal ball when you've got Auto Scaling?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleta
7 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option C might be sufficient with just ECS and Auto Scaling to handle the traffic spikes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
7 months ago
I was thinking the same thing! ECS and Auto Scaling are the perfect combo to handle those unpredictable traffic spikes in the gaming industry. It's like having a superpower to control the ebbs and flows of your infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
Percy
6 months ago
C) Elastic Compute Service (ECS) + Auto Scaling
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
7 months ago
A) Server Load Balancer (SLB) + Elastic Compute Service (ECS) + ApsaraDB for RDS + Auto Scaling
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hassie
8 months ago
I agree with Noah, having Server Load Balancer, ECS, RDS, and Auto Scaling will ensure optimal performance and cost efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
8 months ago
Option C is the way to go! With ECS and Auto Scaling, you can easily scale up and down based on demand. No need to worry about over or under-provisioning resources.
upvoted 0 times
Weldon
7 months ago
That's true. It's a smart way to ensure we have the right amount of resources at all times without manual intervention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
7 months ago
Agreed! Auto Scaling will automatically adjust the number of ECS instances based on demand, saving us from unnecessary costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
7 months ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. With ECS and Auto Scaling, we can handle the unpredictable traffic in the gaming industry.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noah
8 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it includes all the necessary components to handle fluctuating traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel