Alibaba ACP-Cloud1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACP-Cloud1 exam

Question #: 82
Topic #: 1

You need to create a new ECS instance for a 10-data test. Which of the following billing methods is most cost-effective?

APay-AS-You-Go with Savings Plan

BPreemptible

CSubscription

DPay-As-You-Go

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

According to the Alibaba Cloud ECS documentation1, the Pay-As-You-Go billing method is flexible and suitable for short-term or uncertain workloads. However, it is also the most expensive option compared to other billing methods. To reduce the cost of Pay-As-You-Go instances, you can purchase a Savings Plan, which is a discount plan that offers lower prices for a fixed amount of hourly usage. A Savings Plan can be applied to any Pay-As-You-Go instance in the same region, regardless of the instance type, operating system, or zone. Therefore, option A is the most cost-effective billing method for a 10-day test, as it allows you to enjoy the flexibility of Pay-As-You-Go and the savings of a fixed commitment. Reference: Billing methods and Savings Plan.

by Elizabeth at May 02, 2025, 08:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACP-Cloud1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dong

4 months ago

Wait, are preemptible instances really that reliable?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hershel

4 months ago

I think Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan is better for flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melita

4 months ago

Definitely leaning towards Pay-As-You-Go for this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

5 months ago

Subscription might lock you in too much for a test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristin

5 months ago

Preemptible instances are usually the cheapest!

upvoted 0 times

...

Olen

5 months ago

I’m leaning towards Subscription since it might offer better rates for long-term use, but I need to double-check if it applies here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question about billing methods, and I feel like Pay-As-You-Go is flexible, but maybe not the cheapest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Walker

6 months ago

I think Preemptible instances are usually cheaper, but they can be terminated at any time, which might not be ideal for a test.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

6 months ago

I remember we discussed the cost-effectiveness of different billing methods, but I'm not sure if Savings Plans apply to ECS instances.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

6 months ago

Easy peasy! For a 10-data test, the most cost-effective option is definitely Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan. You get the flexibility of on-demand pricing with the added savings from the Savings Plan. Can't go wrong with that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosenda

6 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. What's the difference between the billing methods? I know Subscription is usually the most expensive, but I'm not sure how the others compare in terms of cost-effectiveness for a short 10-data test. I'll need to do some more research before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about Preemptible instances for this case. The test is only 10 data, so the cost savings from Preemptible may not be that significant. I'm leaning more towards the Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan option - it offers a good balance of flexibility and cost savings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

6 months ago

I think the most cost-effective option for a 10-data test would be Preemptible instances. They're significantly cheaper than on-demand instances, and the 10-data test shouldn't be too long, so the risk of interruption is probably worth the savings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ming

10 months ago

I prefer D) Pay-As-You-Go for flexibility, even though it may cost a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

11 months ago

I think C) Subscription might be a good option if you plan to use the instance for a longer period.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladis

11 months ago

Subscription? No way, that's like signing a contract with the cloud provider's mafia. I'll stick with Pay-As-You-Go, thank you very much. Gotta keep my options open, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Verdell

10 months ago

Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan might be the best of both worlds, cost-effective and flexible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antione

10 months ago

I think Preemptible could be a good option for short-term tests like this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

11 months ago

I agree, Subscription feels too restrictive. Pay-As-You-Go gives more flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgene

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe B) Preemptible instances would be cheaper for a short test like this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chu

11 months ago

I'd go with the Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan. It's the most reliable and predictable option. Who needs the thrill of Preemptible instances when you can have a nice, boring, and budget-friendly solution?

upvoted 0 times

Hollis

10 months ago

Preemptible instances might be cheaper, but they come with risks of being terminated at any time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

10 months ago

I think Subscription could also be a good option for long-term projects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

10 months ago

I agree, the Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan is the way to go for a stable cost.

upvoted 0 times

...

Essie

12 months ago

I think the most cost-effective option is A) Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarina

12 months ago

Hmm, I think the Preemptible option would be best for a 10-data test. It's the most cost-effective, right? Plus, it's like a game of Russian roulette with your instances - the excitement keeps me on my toes!

upvoted 0 times