Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Alibaba Exam ACP-Cloud1 Topic 1 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACP-Cloud1 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 1
[All ACP-Cloud1 Questions]

You need to create a new ECS instance for a 10-data test. Which of the following billing methods is most cost-effective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

According to the Alibaba Cloud ECS documentation1, the Pay-As-You-Go billing method is flexible and suitable for short-term or uncertain workloads. However, it is also the most expensive option compared to other billing methods. To reduce the cost of Pay-As-You-Go instances, you can purchase a Savings Plan, which is a discount plan that offers lower prices for a fixed amount of hourly usage. A Savings Plan can be applied to any Pay-As-You-Go instance in the same region, regardless of the instance type, operating system, or zone. Therefore, option A is the most cost-effective billing method for a 10-day test, as it allows you to enjoy the flexibility of Pay-As-You-Go and the savings of a fixed commitment. Reference: Billing methods and Savings Plan.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ming
1 months ago
I prefer D) Pay-As-You-Go for flexibility, even though it may cost a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
2 months ago
I think C) Subscription might be a good option if you plan to use the instance for a longer period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
2 months ago
Subscription? No way, that's like signing a contract with the cloud provider's mafia. I'll stick with Pay-As-You-Go, thank you very much. Gotta keep my options open, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Verdell
27 days ago
Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan might be the best of both worlds, cost-effective and flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
30 days ago
I think Preemptible could be a good option for short-term tests like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
I agree, Subscription feels too restrictive. Pay-As-You-Go gives more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgene
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe B) Preemptible instances would be cheaper for a short test like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
2 months ago
I'd go with the Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan. It's the most reliable and predictable option. Who needs the thrill of Preemptible instances when you can have a nice, boring, and budget-friendly solution?
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
25 days ago
Preemptible instances might be cheaper, but they come with risks of being terminated at any time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
1 months ago
I think Subscription could also be a good option for long-term projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
1 months ago
I agree, the Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan is the way to go for a stable cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Essie
3 months ago
I think the most cost-effective option is A) Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the Preemptible option would be best for a 10-data test. It's the most cost-effective, right? Plus, it's like a game of Russian roulette with your instances - the excitement keeps me on my toes!
upvoted 0 times
Dong
1 months ago
Subscription might be a good option for long-term use, but for a 10-data test, Preemptible seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
1 months ago
I prefer Pay-As-You-Go with Savings Plan. It offers good savings and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
2 months ago
I think Preemptible is the way to go. It's cost-effective and adds some excitement to your instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel