New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Regulation Exam - Topic 2 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Regulation exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 2
[All CPA-Regulation Questions]

Cobb, an unmarried individual, had an adjusted gross income of $200,000 in 1990 before any IRA deduction, taxable social security benefits, or passive activity losses. Cobb incurred a loss of $30,000 in 1990 from rental real estate in which he actively participated. What amount of loss attributable to this rental real estate can be used in 1990 as an offset against income from nonpassive sources?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Choice 'a' is correct. Cobb may not use any of the loss attributable to his rental real estate as an offset against income from nonpassive sources in 1990 because he does not qualify for the 'Mom and Pop' exception. Under this exception, up to $25,000 of passive losses and the deduction equivalent of tax credits that are attributable to rental real estate may be used as an offset against income from nonpassive sources. This $25,000 allowance is reduced, but not below zero, by 50% of the amount by which the individual's modified AGI exceeds $100,000. The $25,000 is therefore completely phased out when modified AGI reaches $150,000. Because Cobb's AGI was $200,000, he did not qualify for the exception.

Choices 'b', 'c', and 'd' are incorrect. Rental activities are passive activities and generally are not allowed to use any of the loss attributable to the rental activity to offset any income produced from nonpassive sources. There is a limited exception in the case of losses from rental real estate in which the taxpayer actively participates, but Cobb did not qualify for it.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ardella
4 months ago
I thought it was more for unmarried individuals, but I guess not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
4 months ago
Yep, $0 for income over $100k, so $25k is right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
4 months ago
Wait, is it really just $25,000? Seems low for a $30k loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
4 months ago
Totally agree, it's the max allowed for active participation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
5 months ago
Cobb can only use $25,000 of that loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. IBM Cloud is the focus, so it's probably not a generic tool like Git. Rational Team Concert sounds like an IBM-specific product, so I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Replicat parameters. I think the answer is C. SOURCEDEFS, since that parameter is used to specify the location of the source table definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If Router 1 is centrally learning the topology, then Router 2 must be feeding it that information, right? That sounds like option A to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
Don't forget the 20% expansion! I'll calculate my base need and then add that extra capacity. Tricky detail they snuck in there.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel