Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Financial Exam - Topic 3 Question 113 Discussion

Posted by Odelia on Jul 10, 2025 at 03:59 AM

A transaction that is unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence should be reported separately as a component of income:

Suggested Answer: D

Choice 'd' is correct. An extraordinary item (a transaction that is both 'unusual in nature' and 'infrequent in occurrence') should be reported separately as a component of income after discontinued operations of a segment of a business.

The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle is shown on the retained earnings statement.

This is why memorizing the mnemonic 'idea' is so important.


Get Premium CPA-Financial Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
FL
Flo 10 months ago
I'm not so sure about that, seems a bit off.
SC
Scarlet 10 months ago
Wait, why would it be before discontinued operations?
VA
Vallie 10 months ago
I agree, option A makes the most sense!
CA
Carma 10 months ago
It's definitely reported after cumulative effects.
DO
Dong 10 months ago
Unusual transactions should be reported separately, true!
KA
Kandis 11 months ago
I remember discussing this in class, and I believe it’s important to report these transactions after the cumulative effect but before any discontinued operations. So maybe A?
EL
Elin 11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about where to place unusual transactions. I thought they came before discontinued operations, but now I’m second-guessing myself.
DY
Dyan 11 months ago
This feels similar to a practice question I did last week. I think the answer is B, but I can't recall the exact reasoning behind it.
CO
Cory 11 months ago
I think I remember that unusual transactions should be reported after the cumulative effect, but I'm not sure if it's before or after discontinued operations.
AL
Alyce 12 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I know the transaction needs to be reported separately, but I'm not sure if it goes before or after the other items mentioned. I'll have to review my notes and think it through carefully.
VI
Viola 12 months ago
I've got this! The answer is C - the unusual, infrequent transaction should be reported before the cumulative effect of accounting changes and before discontinued operations. That keeps it separate from the normal business activities.
VA
Van 12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the proper placement of an unusual, infrequent transaction on the income statement. I'll need to consider the timing of the transaction relative to other items like accounting changes and discontinued operations.
LI
Lili 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure where this type of transaction would be reported on the income statement. I'll need to review the accounting standards to make sure I get this right.
KE
Kerry 1 year ago
I think I know the answer to this one. The key is that the transaction is unusual and infrequent, so it should be reported separately from the normal operations of the business.
TE
Temeka 1 year ago
Because reporting unusual transactions before accounting changes makes more sense to me.
FE
Felix 1 year ago
Why do you think it's C?
GL
Glory 1 year ago
C is the way to go, my friends. Unusual transactions should be reported before any other changes. Simple as that!
SA
Sang 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
Yes, C is the way to go. Unusual transactions need to be clearly identified and reported before any other changes.
EM
Emmanuel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
I think C makes sense too. It's important to highlight unusual transactions separately from other components of income.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
I agree, C is the correct answer. Unusual transactions should be reported separately before any other changes.
TE
Temeka 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's C.
FE
Felix 1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
AL
Aleshia 1 year ago
D seems like the best option to me. Unusual transactions should come after discontinued operations, not before.
NO
Norah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Aleshia
D seems like the best option to me. Unusual transactions should come after discontinued operations, not before.
DE
Deeanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Aleshia
A) After cumulative effect of accounting changes and before discontinued operations of a segment of a business.
LA
Larae 1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. It makes sense to report unusual transactions after any accounting changes and discontinued operations.
GE
Geoffrey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Larae
User 3: I agree with Geoffrey. A seems to be the most logical choice for reporting unusual transactions.
LA
Lashunda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Larae
User 2: I believe A is the correct answer. Unusual transactions should be reported after accounting changes but before discontinued operations.
LA
Lajuana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Larae
User 1: I think C is the correct answer. Unusual transactions should be reported before accounting changes and discontinued operations.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel