New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Financial Exam - Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Financial exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-Financial Questions]

On January 2, 1993, Quo, Inc. hired Reed to be its controller. During the year, Reed, working closely with Quo's president and outside accountants, made changes in accounting policies, corrected several errors dating from 1992 and before, and instituted new accounting policies.

Quo's 1993 financial statements will be presented in comparative form with its 1992 financial statements.

This question represents one of Quo's transactions. List B represents the general accounting treatment required for these transactions. These treatments are:

* Cumulative effect approach - Include the cumulative effect of the adjustment resulting from the accounting change or error correction in the 1993 financial statements, and do not restate the 1992 financial statements.

* Retroactive or retrospective restatement approach - Restate the 1992 financial statements and adjust 1992 beginning retained earnings if the error or change affects a period prior to 1992.

* Prospective approach - Report 1993 and future financial statements on the new basis but do not restate 1992 financial statements.

Item to Be Answered

Quo changed from LIFO to FIFO to account for its finished goods inventory.

List B (Select one)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'B' is correct. A change in accounting principle should be shown in the retained earnings statement of the earliest year presented as an adjustment of the beginning balance. All prior year financial statements are recast.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dana
4 months ago
I’m not sure, but retroactive might be more accurate here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 months ago
Definitely a prospective approach for future statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
4 months ago
Wait, they changed from LIFO to FIFO? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
4 months ago
I disagree, I think they should restate 1992.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
4 months ago
Sounds like a classic case for the cumulative effect approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
5 months ago
I’m really torn between the cumulative effect and the retrospective restatement. I need to recall how those adjustments work in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
5 months ago
I remember a practice question about changing inventory methods, and I think that was a retrospective restatement. But I'm not entirely sure if it applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
5 months ago
I think we might need to use the cumulative effect approach since it mentions including the cumulative effect in the 1993 statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
If Quo is changing from LIFO to FIFO, I feel like the prospective approach could be the right choice since they won't restate 1992.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the differences between the types of evidence. I'll have to review my notes to make sure I understand which one is considered the "best".
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll evaluate the bias towards the risk events and then correct the assessment accordingly. That way, I can make sure the risk analysis is as accurate as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
5 months ago
The overlapping coverage area and matching SSID seem like obvious prerequisites, but the authentication method is an interesting detail I hadn't considered. I'll make sure to select that one as well.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel