New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Auditing Exam - Topic 2 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Auditing exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 2
[All CPA-Auditing Questions]

In which of the following situations would an auditor ordinarily choose between expressing an "except for" qualified opinion or an adverse opinion?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Choice 'a' is correct. The auditor's report on compliance and on internal control over financial recording (based on an audit) must include the scope of testing of compliance and internal control.

Choice 'b' is incorrect. Material indications of illegal acts are not only reported to the members of the governing body of the audited entity and their senior staff officials but, in some circumstances, auditors should report illegal acts directly to external parties (such as the grantor agency).

Choice 'c' is incorrect. Although GAO standards require that the auditor communicate information regarding the nature, timing and extent of planned testing to officials of the audited entity and to individuals contracting for the audit, reporting of all changes is not required. (For example, immaterial changes to the audit program need not be reported.)

Choice 'd' is incorrect. Certain privileged or confidential information may be prohibited from general disclosure and should not be included in the audit report. The report should, however, disclose the nature of the information omitted and the requirement that makes an opinion necessary.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Curt
4 months ago
Agreed, B is the clear choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? That seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
4 months ago
No way, D is more serious than just an "except for"!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
4 months ago
I think A could also lead to a qualified opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
4 months ago
Definitely B, missing disclosures are a big deal!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
5 months ago
I’m confused about option D. It sounds significant, but I thought that was more about going concern issues rather than qualification types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
I feel like I've seen a similar question before, and it was about the severity of the issue. If it's just a disclosure issue, it might lean towards a qualified opinion, like option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about "except for" opinions being used when there's a scope limitation. Maybe option A fits that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
5 months ago
I think option B might be the right choice since it mentions a failure to disclose required information, which seems serious enough for an adverse opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options seem to cover different aspects of software development, but I'm not sure which one specifically describes CI/CD pipelining. I'll have to review my notes and try to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
5 months ago
The key here is that the question is asking about adding new physical volumes to an existing volume group. Based on that, I think the correct answer is A. vgextend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the key performance indicators for a big data storage system. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which ones are most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the details in the question, the best approach is to create a cycle count threshold that is quantity-based and set the quantity to 10 for item P0001. That way, the cycle count work will be automatically generated when the on-hand quantity drops below 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
9 months ago
I'd go with the 'except for' qualified opinion for the inventory issue. Gotta maintain those auditing standards, even if it means getting a little 'except for' in there.
upvoted 0 times
Portia
8 months ago
D) Events disclosed in the financial statements cause the auditor to have substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
8 months ago
B) The financial statements fail to disclose information that is required by generally accepted accounting principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
8 months ago
A) The auditor did not observe the entity's physical inventory and is unable to become satisfied as to its balance by other auditing procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Galen
10 months ago
Substantial doubt about going concern? That's a tough one. I suppose an adverse opinion is the right call, since the financial statements don't reflect the entity's ability to continue.
upvoted 0 times
Evan
8 months ago
An adverse opinion is definitely the right call in that situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
8 months ago
D) Events disclosed in the financial statements cause the auditor to have substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
9 months ago
A) The auditor did not observe the entity's physical inventory and is unable to become satisfied as to its balance by other auditing procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
10 months ago
Reporting only on the balance sheet? That's a bit odd. I'd probably go with a qualified opinion there - can't give a proper opinion without the full set of statements.
upvoted 0 times
Alva
9 months ago
C) The auditor is asked to report only on the entity's balance sheet and not on the other basic financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
9 months ago
B) The financial statements fail to disclose information that is required by generally accepted accounting principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
9 months ago
A) The auditor did not observe the entity's physical inventory and is unable to become satisfied as to its balance by other auditing procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kendra
11 months ago
But what if the auditor did not observe the entity's physical inventory and is unable to become satisfied as to its balance by other auditing procedures? Wouldn't that also be a situation where they might choose an 'except for' qualified opinion?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
11 months ago
Hmm, failing to disclose GAAP-required information? Definitely grounds for an adverse opinion. The financial statements are misleading without that info.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
9 months ago
B) Definitely, that would definitely lead to an adverse opinion. It's important for the statements to be accurate and complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
10 months ago
A) The financial statements fail to disclose information that is required by generally accepted accounting principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beckie
11 months ago
If the auditor is unable to verify the physical inventory, an 'except for' qualified opinion is the way to go. Can't just ignore a major asset like that!
upvoted 0 times
Gianna
10 months ago
In that case, an adverse opinion might be necessary to reflect the seriousness of the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
10 months ago
D) Events disclosed in the financial statements cause the auditor to have substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
10 months ago
That's right, it's important to address that issue in the opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
10 months ago
A) The auditor did not observe the entity's physical inventory and is unable to become satisfied as to its balance by other auditing procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trinidad
11 months ago
I agree with Marilynn. If there are events causing substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, the auditor may need to consider an adverse opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
11 months ago
I think the auditor would choose between expressing an 'except for' qualified opinion or an adverse opinion in situation D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel