Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AICPA CPA-Auditing Exam - Topic 1 Question 87 Discussion

Which of the following procedures should an auditor generally perform regarding subsequent events?
A) Compare the latest available interim financial statements with the financial statements being audited.
B) Send second requests to the client's customers who failed to respond to initial accounts receivable confirmation requests.
C) Communicate material weaknesses in the internal control structure to those charged with governance.
D) Review the cut-off bank statements for several months after the year-end.

AICPA CPA-Auditing Exam - Topic 1 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Auditing exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-Auditing Questions]

Which of the following procedures should an auditor generally perform regarding subsequent events?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Choice 'a' is correct. An auditor's communication of internal control related matters noted in an audit usually should be addressed to management and those charged with governance.

Choices 'b', 'c', and 'd' are incorrect. The director of internal auditing, the chief financial officer, and the chief accounting officer all would have access to the letter; however, it would not be addressed to them since they do not have the same level of authority and responsibility to the shareholders as management and those charged with governance.


by Barrie at May 10, 2024, 03:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPA-Auditing Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Earleen
7 months ago
C is key, but I’m surprised it’s not mentioned more often!
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
8 months ago
Wait, are we really still doing second requests? Seems outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
8 months ago
Totally agree with A, it’s crucial for accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
8 months ago
I think D is more important, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
8 months ago
A is definitely a must-do for auditors!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
9 months ago
Comparing interim financials to the audited statements seems like a solid approach for identifying subsequent events, so I’m thinking option A could be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
9 months ago
I feel like communicating material weaknesses is more about internal controls than subsequent events, so I'm leaning away from option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
9 months ago
I remember practicing a question about reviewing bank statements, so option D might be relevant here, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
9 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the right procedure for subsequent events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
9 months ago
Based on my understanding, the auditor should compare the latest available interim financial statements with the audited financial statements to identify any significant events that occurred after the reporting period. This is a standard procedure for subsequent event review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
9 months ago
I'm a bit hesitant on this one. While communicating material weaknesses is important, I don't think that's the correct procedure for addressing subsequent events. I'll need to review my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
9 months ago
The key here is to focus on subsequent events. Reviewing the latest interim financial statements would be the best way to identify any material events that occurred after the balance sheet date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think it might have something to do with reviewing the cut-off bank statements, but I'm not confident that's the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
9 months ago
This is a straightforward question. The auditor should generally compare the latest available interim financial statements with the financial statements being audited to identify any subsequent events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
9 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the relationship between unit tests and refactoring. I'll need to revisit my notes on that topic before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
9 months ago
I've got a good feeling about ENCKEYS. That seems like the most logical choice based on what we've covered in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this. I'll have to review my notes on IT governance to figure out the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know APIs are used for cloud integration, but I'm not confident that's the only option. I might need to review my notes on cloud architecture to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The fair value has increased from grant date to reporting date, so I'm not sure if that affects the accounting treatment. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
1 year ago
Subsequent events? More like 'subsequent shenanigans,' am I right? Better have those bank statements on lockdown, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Eliz
1 year ago
D) Review the cut-off bank statements for several months after the year-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
1 year ago
C) Communicate material weaknesses in the internal control structure to those charged with governance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 year ago
B) Send second requests to the client's customers who failed to respond to initial accounts receivable confirmation requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
1 year ago
A) Compare the latest available interim financial statements with the financial statements being audited.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kara
1 year ago
Hmm, Option C is interesting, but it's more about communicating control weaknesses, not subsequent events. Gotta keep our eye on the ball here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Leontine
1 year ago
D) Review the cut-off bank statements for several months after the year-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
1 year ago
B) Send second requests to the client's customers who failed to respond to initial accounts receivable confirmation requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
A) Compare the latest available interim financial statements with the financial statements being audited.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
1 year ago
Hold up, why are we even considering Option B? That's more for the confirmation process, not subsequent events. This is a no-brainer - Option D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Dean
1 year ago
Let's focus on what's necessary for subsequent events. Option D is the best choice for the auditor to perform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 year ago
Yeah, Option D is more relevant to subsequent events. It's important to review the cut-off bank statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
1 year ago
Definitely, Option D is the best choice for ensuring we cover all our bases with subsequent events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 year ago
Yeah, Option D makes the most sense for subsequent events. It's all about reviewing those bank statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
1 year ago
I agree, Option B seems out of place here. Option D is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
1 year ago
I agree, Option B seems out of place here. Option D is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenna
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Comparing the latest interim financial statements with the audited ones (Option A) seems like a more comprehensive approach to subsequent events.
upvoted 0 times
Vanda
1 year ago
True, it's all about making sure we have a complete picture of the company's financial situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
1 year ago
Sending second requests to customers who didn't respond to initial confirmation requests could also be important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
1 year ago
Yeah, that way we can see if there are any significant changes that need to be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 year ago
I think comparing the latest interim financial statements with the audited ones is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Reviewing the cut-off bank statements is crucial for identifying any subsequent events that could impact the financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it's a key procedure to ensure the financial statements are accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, reviewing the cut-off bank statements is important for catching any new events.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salley
1 year ago
I believe reviewing the cut-off bank statements for several months after the year-end is also crucial to detect any potential errors or fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
1 year ago
I agree with Kathryn. It's important to ensure consistency and accuracy in the financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
1 year ago
I think the auditor should compare the latest available interim financial statements with the financial statements being audited.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel