New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA CPA-Auditing Exam - Topic 1 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Auditing exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-Auditing Questions]

Gail is auditing the financial statements of Hoefener Home Improvements, a publicly held company. Gail notes several deficiencies in internal control, and is trying to determine whether each deficiency constitutes a significant deficiency or a material weakness. Which best describes the framework Gail should use in making this evaluation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Choice 'a' is correct. For issuers, a significant deficiency exists for weaknesses that are important enough to merit the attention of those responsible for financial reporting, and a material weakness exists when there is a reasonable possibility of material misstatement.

Choice 'b' is incorrect. For nonissuers, a significant deficiency exists when there is more than a remote chance of a more than inconsequential misstatement, and a material weakness exists when there is more than a remote chance of a material misstatement. However, Hoefener is an issuer, so different rules apply.

Choice 'c' is incorrect. For issuers, a significant deficiency exists for weaknesses that are important enough to merit the attention of those responsible for financial reporting.

Choice 'd' is incorrect. For issuers, a material weakness exists when there is a reasonable possibility of material misstatement.

Government Auditing


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Elli
4 months ago
D is misleading; material weakness shouldn't just be about remote chances!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
4 months ago
I think option C is spot on! Clear definitions for both terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
4 months ago
Wait, how can we be sure about the "reasonable possibility" part? Seems vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
4 months ago
Totally agree with option A! It makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
4 months ago
A significant deficiency is all about importance, while material weakness is about possibility of misstatement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
5 months ago
I believe option B is close, but I’m not sure if it fully aligns with the definitions we discussed in class regarding material weaknesses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the terms used in these options. I feel like I need to double-check what constitutes "more than a remote chance."
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think option C might be the right choice since it talks about reasonable possibility for material misstatement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
5 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it captures the nuances of significant deficiencies versus material weaknesses correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Based on the information provided, the key components to analyze first would be the cause and effect of the incident. Understanding what triggered the ransomware attack and how it impacted the organization is crucial for developing an effective prevention plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The project is in stage 4, so the closure planning should have been done earlier, in stage 3. I'm leaning towards option C as the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel