Management segregates duties among staff in order to reduce the risk of fraud
* Segregation of Duties and the Fraud Triangle:
The Fraud Triangle identifies three conditions that contribute to fraud: pressure, opportunity, and rationalization.
Segregating duties (e.g., separating authorization, recordkeeping, and asset custody) is specifically designed to reduce opportunity, which is the chance for an employee to commit fraud without detection.
* Why Opportunity Is Key:
If one person has too much control over a process, they may exploit it for personal gain. Segregating duties creates checks and balances, making it harder for fraudulent activities to go unnoticed.
* Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A . Pressure: Pressure refers to personal or financial stresses that drive someone to commit fraud, but segregation of duties does not address this directly.
C . Rationalization: Rationalization involves justifying fraudulent behavior, which segregation does not prevent.
D . Detection: While segregation can aid in fraud detection, its primary role is to reduce opportunities for fraud.
* Reference and Documents:
GAO Standards for Internal Control (Green Book): Emphasizes segregation of duties as a control to mitigate opportunities for fraud.
COSO Internal Control Framework: Identifies segregation of duties as a key tool to reduce fraud risk.
Reita
2 months agoMoon
2 months agoMayra
2 months agoGayla
3 months agoBeata
3 months agoValentin
3 months agoMelynda
3 months agoOtis
4 months agoAriel
4 months agoMickie
4 months agoLili
4 months agoEva
4 months agoJonelle
5 months agoTruman
5 months agoLouisa
5 months agoArthur
5 months agoEmeline
5 months agoTien
5 months agoStephaine
5 months agoBrandon
5 months agoLashawnda
7 months agoCarmela
7 months agoJamal
5 months agoOmer
6 months ago