Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E908 Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E908 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E908 Questions]

A client's organizational structure has employees moving on and off projects and switching their Workfront responsibilities often. Why would the system administrator recommend sharing objects with Groups rather than individual users?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Group sharing permissions update automatically as users are added or removed:

Sharing objects with groups ensures that access permissions are dynamically updated as users join or leave groups. This approach simplifies the management of permissions and ensures consistent access control across the organization.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Idella
5 hours ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think option C sounds right since it would help manage access as people move around.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
6 days ago
I remember something about group access being more efficient, but I can't recall if it overrides individual access or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
11 days ago
I think sharing with groups makes sense because it could simplify permissions, but I'm not sure if it automatically updates when users change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
17 days ago
The key here is that Groups allow you to manage access more efficiently when people's responsibilities are changing often. Updating individual permissions would be a nightmare, so Groups seem like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
22 days ago
I'm a little confused about the difference between sharing with Groups versus individual users. Does that mean objects can't be shared with both? I'll need to review that part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
28 days ago
Okay, let me think this through. If Group access overrides individual access, that could help maintain permissions as people move between projects. And if sharing updates automatically as users change, that would be really helpful in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 month ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the reasoning behind sharing objects with Groups rather than individual users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
2 months ago
I agree with Rene, sharing with Groups makes it easier to manage access for employees moving between projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
3 months ago
I agree, C is the way to go. The automatic updates on group membership are a real time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
2 months ago
A) Group access overrides an individual's access when assigned to an object
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreta
3 months ago
Option C makes the most sense. Keeping object sharing at the group level makes it easier to manage access as the team changes.
upvoted 0 times
Oren
1 month ago
I agree, it would be a hassle to update individual user permissions every time someone joins or leaves a project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 months ago
Option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rene
3 months ago
I think the system administrator would recommend sharing objects with Groups because it's more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel